Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289697›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Evaluation and analysis of risk factors for adverse events of the fractured vertebra post-percutaneous kyphoplasty: a retrospective cohort study using multiple machine learning models.

YingLun Zhao, Li Bo, XueMing Chen, YanHui Wang, LiBin Cui, Yuan Xin, Liu Liang, Kong Chao, ShiBao Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting the risk of refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in OVCF patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

YingLun ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.
Li BoDepartment of Bone Center, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
XueMing ChenDepartment of Bone Center, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
YanHui WangDepartment of Bone Center, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
LiBin CuiDepartment of Bone Center, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Yuan XinDepartment of Bone Center, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Liu LiangDepartment of Bone Center, Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Kong ChaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.
ShiBao LuDepartment of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China. spinelu@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse events of the fractured vertebra (AEFV) post-percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) can lead to recurrent pain and neurological damage, which considerably affect the prognosis of patients and the quality of life. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of AEFV and develop and select the optimal risk prediction model for AEFV to provide guidance for the prevention of this condition and enhancement of clinical outcomes.

methodsThis work included 383 patients with primary osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) who underwent PKP. The patients were grouped based on the occurrence of AEFV postsurgery, and data were collected. Group comparisons and correlation analysis were conducted to identify potential risk factors, which were then included in the five prediction models. The performance indicators served as basis for the selection of the best model.

resultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following independent risk factors for AEFV: kissing spine (odds ratio (OR) = 8.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-49.02), high paravertebral muscle fat infiltration grade (OR = 29.19, 95% CI 4.83-176.04), vertebral body computed tomography value (OR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.003-0.13, P < 0.001), and large Cobb change (OR = 5.31, 95% CI 1.77-15.77). The support vector machine (SVM) model exhibited the best performance in the prediction of the risk of AEFV.

conclusionFour independent risk factors were identified of AEFV, and five risk prediction models that can aid clinicians in the accurate identification of high-risk patients and prediction of the occurrence of AEFV were developed.

Indexed as

KyphoplastyMachine LearningOsteoporotic FracturesPostoperative ComplicationsSpinal FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFractures, CompressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAdverse events of the fractured vertebraMachine learning modelsOsteoporotic vertebral compression fracturePredictionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39289697
PMCPMC11409519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.