Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289654›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Frozen shoulder: subjects' needs and perspectives and clinicians' beliefs and management strategies: do they align? A cross-sectional study.

Fabrizio Brindisino, Sara Sciscione, Arianna Andriesse, Matteo Cioeta, Filip Struyf, Daniel Feller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabrizio BrindisinoDepartment of Medicine and Health Science "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy. fabrizio.brindisino@unimol.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8950-8203
Sara Sciscione"Riabilita" private practice, Sabaudia, LT, Italy.
Arianna AndriesseMedical Translation Private Practice c/o Andriesse Medical Translator, Lecce, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6087-4436
Matteo CioetaIRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, 00166, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3861-6858
Filip StruyfDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-9684
Daniel FellerProvincial Agency for Health of the Autonomous Province of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9853-3486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePhysiotherapists (PTs) play a crucial role in managing individuals with Frozen Shoulder (FS), frequently being the first healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of this condition.

aimThis study aimed to compare the beliefs, expectations, and perspectives of individuals with FS with the knowledge, skills, and strategies of PTs, highlighting similarities and differences.

methodThis study adhered to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). From May 1st to August 1st, 2023, a two-part survey was conducted involving PTs and individuals diagnosed with FS. The survey focused on comparing key areas such as clinical assessment, patient education, treatment expectations, and the psychological aspects of the patient-clinician relationship.

resultsA total of 501 PTs and 110 subjects with FS participated in the survey. Most PTs showed proficiency in FS pathoanatomical conditions and were also attentive to psychological aspects (88.4%), describing the pathology evolution in three or two stages (68.2%). They also highlighted the importance of patient education (89.6%) and recognized the potential benefits of a multiprofessional collaboration in managing FS (82.2%). Reassurance was reported as a priority by 32.3% of PTs. Subjects with FS expressed a preference for PTs who are both expert and empathetic (73.6%). Regarding their understanding of FS, 29.09% of subjects reported receiving a three-phase explanation, while 26.36% felt inadequately informed. Nearly half of the subjects (49.09%) anticipated being managed independently by a PT, with 93.64% prioritizing the improvement of their range of motion.

conclusionThis study revealed a general agreement between subjects with FS and PTs regarding aspects of the therapeutic relationship, patient education, pathology management, compliance and motivation strategies, and pain management preferences. However, significant differences emerged concerning the perception of physiotherapy effectiveness, primary treatment goals, subjects' priorities, and the importance of psychological assessment.

Indexed as

BursitisHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysical TherapistsAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdhesive capsulitisFrozen shoulderPatient Healthcare acceptancePhysical therapy modalitiesPsychological factor

Identifiers

PMID39289654
PMCPMC11406753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.