ArticleBMC cancer2024
Altered microbial diversity and composition of multiple mucosal organs in cervical cancer patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis of Gut Microbiota-Associated Metabolites and Related Host Molecular Signatures in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Heavy Metal Transfer from Cigarette Smoke to Lung Tissue: Inducing on Pulmonary Function and Bronchoalveolar Microbiome Dysregulation in Rats.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Cervical and Tumor-Associated Microbiomes in Botswana Women With and Without HIV With Carcinoma of the Cervix Before and After Definitive Chemoradiation.JCO global oncology · 2025Article
- Association of Intratumoral Microbiota Modulation with Prostate Cancer Progression: A Microbiome Analysis of Prostatic Tissue.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- A potential association between the characteristics of the multi-organ microbiota and lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to characterize the microbiome of multiple mucosal organs in cervical cancer (CC) patients.
methodsWe collected oral, gut, urinary tract, and vaginal samples from enrolled study participants, as well as tumor tissue from CC patients. The microbiota of different mucosal organs was identified by 16S rDNA sequencing and correlated with clinical-pathological characteristics of cervical cancer cases.
resultsCompared with controls, CC patients had reduced α-diversity of oral and gut microbiota (p
conclusionsOur study not only revealed differences in the composition and diversity of the vaginal and gut microflora between CC cases and controls, but also showed dysbiosis of the oral cavity and urethra in cervical cancer cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.