Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289570›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2024

Data-driven risk stratification and precision management of pulmonary nodules detected on chest computed tomography.

Chengdi Wang, Jun Shao, Yichu He, Jiaojiao Wu, Xingting Liu, Liuqing Yang, Ying Wei, Xiang Sean Zhou, Yiqiang Zhan, Feng Shi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical value of combinedOncology reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Expert Consensus on Precision Management of Pulmonary Nodules (2026 Version)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chengdi Wang *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Targeted Tracer Research and Development Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. chengdi_wang@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5284-2889
Jun Shao *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Targeted Tracer Research and Development Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yichu He *Department of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Jiaojiao WuDepartment of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Xingting LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Targeted Tracer Research and Development Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Liuqing YangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Targeted Tracer Research and Development Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ying WeiDepartment of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China.
Xiang Sean ZhouSchool of Biomedical Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Yiqiang ZhanSchool of Biomedical Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Feng ShiDepartment of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Shanghai, China. feng.shi@uii-ai.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-9943
Dinggang ShenSchool of Biomedical Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China. Dinggang.Shen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-5698
Weimin LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Targeted Tracer Research and Development Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. weimi003@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-0311

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82100119,82341083National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 92159302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in lung cancer screening has led to the increasing detection of pulmonary nodules. However, precisely evaluating the malignancy risk of pulmonary nodules remains a formidable challenge. Here we propose a triage-driven Chinese Lung Nodules Reporting and Data System (C-Lung-RADS) utilizing a medical checkup cohort of 45,064 cases. The system was operated in a stepwise fashion, initially distinguishing low-, mid-, high- and extremely high-risk nodules based on their size and density. Subsequently, it progressively integrated imaging information, demographic characteristics and follow-up data to pinpoint suspicious malignant nodules and refine the risk scale. The multidimensional system achieved a state-of-the-art performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.918 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.918-0.919) on the internal testing dataset, outperforming the single-dimensional approach (AUC of 0.881, 95% CI 0.880-0.882). Moreover, C-Lung-RADS exhibited a superior sensitivity compared with Lung-RADS v2022 (87.1% versus 63.3%) in an independent cohort, which was screened using mobile computed tomography scanners to broaden screening accessibility in resource-constrained settings. With its foundation in precise risk stratification and tailored management, this system has minimized unnecessary invasive procedures for low-risk cases and recommended prompt intervention for extremely high-risk nodules to avert diagnostic delays. This approach has the potential to enhance the decision-making paradigm and facilitate a more efficient diagnosis of lung cancer during routine checkups as well as screening scenarios.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineRisk AssessmentSolitary Pulmonary Nodule

Identifiers

PMID39289570
PMCPMC11564084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.