ArticleNature protocols2025
CellChat for systematic analysis of cell-cell communication from single-cell transcriptomics.
Article in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 961 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
961 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting an IL-17/IL-36 pathogenic hub in hidradenitis suppurativa with a bispecific antibody.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Nuclear mechanotransduction: tools for mechanical perturbation and chromatin characterization.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals dysregulation of innate immune signaling in early-life respiratory syncytial virus infection with subsequent low-level cadmium exposure.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- TXNRD1-driven enteric glial remodeling promotes neuronal dysfunction in Hirschsprung disease.iScience · 2026Article
- Single-cell gene regulatory networks characterize colonic stem and immune cell homeostasis iniScience · 2026Article
- Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the human fetal uveal tract reveals heterogeneity in melanocyte populations.iScience · 2026Article
- CD200Nature communications · 2026Article
- Interpretable AI model reveals spatial codes of cell recruitment in tissues.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Vascular profiling of the spinal cord and cortex reveals region-specific endothelial dysfunction and fibroblast remodeling in human ALS.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Human adult and pediatric multimodal transcriptomic atlas of progression from pressure-loaded to failing right ventricle.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics reveals transcriptional reprogramming and microenvironmental remodeling in ectopic ACTH/CRH-secreting pheochromocytomas.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics identify a JUNB+ neutrophil subset enriched in immune-excluded regions of lung adenocarcinoma.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Characterization of SPP1 + macrophages and their correlation with resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Article
- Spatial transcriptomics reveals microenvironmental heterogeneity in osteoarthritic subchondral bone.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Reconstructing signaling histories of single cells via perturbation screens and transfer learning.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Integrated Multi-Omics and Single-Cell Analyses Implicate NOX4 as an Icariin-Associated Oxidative Stress Regulatory Node in Gastric Cancer.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- The dual roles of uterine monocytes in regulation of tissue homeostasis throughout reproductive cycles in health and disease.Nature immunology · 2026Article
- Factor IX Padua AAV gene therapy in adolescents with hemophilia B: a phase 1 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Article
901 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technologies offer an opportunity to explore cell-cell communication in tissues systematically and with reduced bias. A key challenge is integrating known molecular interactions and measurements into a framework to identify and analyze complex cell-cell communication networks. Previously, we developed a computational tool, named CellChat, that infers and analyzes cell-cell communication networks from single-cell transcriptomic data within an easily interpretable framework. CellChat quantifies the signaling communication probability between two cell groups using a simplified mass-action-based model, which incorporates the core interaction between ligands and receptors with multisubunit structure along with modulation by cofactors. Importantly, CellChat performs a systematic and comparative analysis of cell-cell communication using a variety of quantitative metrics and machine-learning approaches. CellChat v2 is an updated version that includes additional comparison functionalities, an expanded database of ligand-receptor pairs along with rich functional annotations, and an Interactive CellChat Explorer. Here we provide a step-by-step protocol for using CellChat v2 on single-cell transcriptomic data, including inference and analysis of cell-cell communication from one dataset and identification of altered intercellular communication, signals and cell populations from different datasets across biological conditions. The R implementation of CellChat v2 toolkit and its tutorials together with the graphic outputs are available at https://github.com/jinworks/CellChat . This protocol typically takes ~5 min depending on dataset size and requires a basic understanding of R and single-cell data analysis but no specialized bioinformatics training for its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39289562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.