Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289562›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2025

CellChat for systematic analysis of cell-cell communication from single-cell transcriptomics.

Suoqin Jin, Maksim V Plikus, Qing Nie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 961 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
961citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

961 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CD200Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics identify a JUNB+ neutrophil subset enriched in immune-excluded regions of lung adenocarcinoma.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

901 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suoqin JinSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. sqjin@whu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5131-0215
Maksim V PlikusNSF-Simons Center for Multiscale Cell Fate Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-2559
Qing NieNSF-Simons Center for Multiscale Cell Fate Research, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. qnie@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8804-3368

Funding

Uncover Strategies Used By Biological SystemsP50GM076516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI NIE, QING · 2007 to 2016
$25.1M
Dissecting single cell dynamics that coordinate neural crest migration and diversificationR01DE030565 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI NIE, QING, SCHILLING, THOMAS F · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Inc.) R01AR079150Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Inc.) R01DE030565National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 92374108National Science Foundation (NSF) MCB2028424NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE030565NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technologies offer an opportunity to explore cell-cell communication in tissues systematically and with reduced bias. A key challenge is integrating known molecular interactions and measurements into a framework to identify and analyze complex cell-cell communication networks. Previously, we developed a computational tool, named CellChat, that infers and analyzes cell-cell communication networks from single-cell transcriptomic data within an easily interpretable framework. CellChat quantifies the signaling communication probability between two cell groups using a simplified mass-action-based model, which incorporates the core interaction between ligands and receptors with multisubunit structure along with modulation by cofactors. Importantly, CellChat performs a systematic and comparative analysis of cell-cell communication using a variety of quantitative metrics and machine-learning approaches. CellChat v2 is an updated version that includes additional comparison functionalities, an expanded database of ligand-receptor pairs along with rich functional annotations, and an Interactive CellChat Explorer. Here we provide a step-by-step protocol for using CellChat v2 on single-cell transcriptomic data, including inference and analysis of cell-cell communication from one dataset and identification of altered intercellular communication, signals and cell populations from different datasets across biological conditions. The R implementation of CellChat v2 toolkit and its tutorials together with the graphic outputs are available at https://github.com/jinworks/CellChat . This protocol typically takes ~5 min depending on dataset size and requires a basic understanding of R and single-cell data analysis but no specialized bioinformatics training for its implementation.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansSoftware

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.