ArticleHeredity2024
Analysing the pedigree to identify undesirable losses of genetic diversity and to prioritize management decisions in captive breeding: a case study.
Article in Heredity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Whole genome sequencing informs SNP-based breeding strategies to safeguard genetic diversity in captive African lions.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When prevention of species extinction is the priority, captive breeding is a key component in conservation programmes, allowing the recording of pedigree information in studbooks. The genealogical information registered in Cuvier's gazelle studbook between 1975 and 2023 was analysed to (a) assess if the implemented mating policy was successful in preserving the genetic background of the founders (1 male:3 females) in the present population, and b) improve future management and breeding decisions. Although the maternal contribution of one founder female was lost and the mean inbreeding of the total live population was high (0.305 ± 0.095), the breeding policy applied produced better results than expected from a population starting from four founders. It was successful in keeping the individual increase in inbreeding low (0.047 ± 0.021), and, notably, the inbreeding tended to decrease during the last three decades of the breeding programme, ensuring the viability of this highly inbred population. Historical dissemination of individuals among the zoos of Europe and North America caused population structuring and genetic differentiation of the live North American population. However, it did not risk the viability of the captive population. The average relatedness coefficients allowed the identification of individuals with underrepresented genotypes, which is relevant to plan future mating guidelines to keep the founders' representation balanced in the next generations. This study highlights the importance of keeping long-term pedigree information to monitor changes in the genetic diversity of captive populations, which is crucial to implement optimal mating decisions and assuring their long-term viability within an ex situ conservation programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.