ArticleScientific reports2024
Machine learning based classification of presence utilizing psychophysiological signals in immersive virtual environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotional Regulation and Physiological Responses to a Cultural Heritage Virtual Reality Experience in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Exploratory Investigation of Motor and Psychophysiological Outcomes Following VR-Based Motor Training with Augmented Sensory Feedback for a Pilot Cohort with Spinal Cord Injury.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Virtual Reality (VR), a higher level of presence positively influences the experience and engagement of a user. There are several parameters that are responsible for generating different levels of presence in VR, including but not limited to, graphical fidelity, multi-sensory stimuli, and embodiment. However, standard methods of measuring presence, including self-reported questionnaires, are biased. This research focuses on developing a robust model, via machine learning, to detect different levels of presence in VR using multimodal neurological and physiological signals, including electroencephalography and electrodermal activity. An experiment has been undertaken whereby participants (N = 22) were each exposed to three different levels of presence (high, medium, and low) in a random order in VR. Four parameters within each level, including graphics fidelity, audio cues, latency, and embodiment with haptic feedback, were systematically manipulated to differentiate the levels. A number of multi-class classifiers were evaluated within a three-class classification problem, using a One-vs-Rest approach, including Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbour, Extra Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Multiple Layer Perceptron. Results demonstrated that the Multiple Layer Perceptron model obtained the highest macro average accuracy of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.