Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289421›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

How storage post sampling influences the stability of sebum when used for mass spectrometry metabolomics analysis?

Caitlin Walton-Doyle, Eleanor Sinclair, Humayra Begum, Katherine A Hollywood, Drupad K Trivedi, Perdita Barran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caitlin Walton-DoyleThe Michael Barber Centre for Collaborative Mass Spectrometry, The Department of Chemistry The Manchester Institute for Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Eleanor SinclairThe Michael Barber Centre for Collaborative Mass Spectrometry, The Department of Chemistry The Manchester Institute for Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Humayra BegumThe Michael Barber Centre for Collaborative Mass Spectrometry, The Department of Chemistry The Manchester Institute for Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Katherine A HollywoodThe Michael Barber Centre for Collaborative Mass Spectrometry, The Department of Chemistry The Manchester Institute for Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Drupad K TrivediThe Michael Barber Centre for Collaborative Mass Spectrometry, The Department of Chemistry The Manchester Institute for Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Perdita BarranThe Michael Barber Centre for Collaborative Mass Spectrometry, The Department of Chemistry The Manchester Institute for Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK. Perdita.barran@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R505869/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T019328/1Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research 12921Parkinson's UK K-1504Parkinsons UK K-1504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sebum is a biofluid excreted by sebaceous glands in the skin. In recent years sebum has been shown to contain endogenous metabolites diagnostic of disease, with remarkable results for Parkinson's Disease. Given that sebum sampling is facile and non-invasive, its potential for use in clinical biochemistry diagnostic assays should be explored including the parameters for standard operating procedures around collection, transport, and storage. To this aim we have here investigated the reproducibility of mass spectrometry data from sebum in relation to both storage temperature and length of storage. Sebum samples were collected from volunteers and stored for up to four weeks at a range of temperatures: ambient (circa 17 °C), -20 °C and -80 °C. Established extraction protocols were employed and samples were analysed by two chromatographic mass spectrometry techniques and data investigated using PCA, PLS-DA and ANOVA. We cannot discriminate samples as a function of storage temperature or time stored in unsupervised analysis using data acquired via TD-GC-MS and LC-IM-MS, although the sampling of volatiles was susceptible to batch effects. This study indicates that the requirements for storage and transport of sebum samples that may be used in clinical assays are less stringent than for liquid samples and indicate that sebum is suitable for remote and at home sampling prior to analysis.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryMetabolomicsSebumSpecimen HandlingAdultFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsTemperature

Identifiers

PMID39289421
PMCPMC11408688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.