Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289420›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Age-related analysis of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy Chinese individuals.

Yihan Guo, Li-Li Guo, Weiqiang Yang, Lei Tian, Ying Jie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of astigmatism type influence onFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yihan GuoBeijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Li-Li GuoThe First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou, China.
Weiqiang YangBeijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lei TianBeijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China. tianlei0131@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7216-5352
Ying JieBeijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China. jie_yingcn@aliyun.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2649-8241

Funding

Beijing Nova Program Z181100006218099National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171101The Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7242019The Capital Health Research and Development of Special 2024-2-1082The Open Research Fund from Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine BHTR-KFJJ-202001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To report the correlation between corneal biomechanical parameters and age in healthy Chinese individuals. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 864 eyes of 543 healthy participants. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination and corneal biomechanics examination using Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST) were conducted. Based on age, all participants were further divided into five age groups (n) as follows: group A, 11-20 years (105); group B, 21-30 years (112); group C, 31-40 years (113); group D, 41-50 years (100); and group E, > 50 years (113). Using Corvis ST, we examined 35 corneal biomechanical parameters and compared them across the different age groups. Spearman's correlation coefficients and stepwise multivariate linear regression models were used to investigate whether the corneal biomechanical parameters were related to demographic and ocular characteristics. A correlation analysis between the left and right eyes revealed that 13 parameters were significantly associated with eye differences. Among the 35 corneal biomechanical parameters, 28 exhibited significant differences across the age groups, with stiffness parameter at applanation 1(SPA1) showing an upward trend after the age of 30 and stress-strain index (SSI) demonstrates a statistically significant upward trend when comparing the five age groups in the study. Additionally, Spearman's correlation analysis and stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that 11 corneal biomechanical parameters were positively correlated with age and 10 were negatively correlated with age. Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) was significantly negatively correlated with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT), SSI was significantly positively correlated with age and IOP, and SPA1 were positively correlated with IOP and CCT. In conclusion, most corneal biomechanical parameters showed a significant correlation with age, with corneal stiffness progressively increasing alongside advancing age, IOP, or CCT.

Indexed as

CorneaAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAgingBiomechanical PhenomenaChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIntraocular PressureMaleAgeChineseCorneal biomechanicsCorneal visualization Scheimpflug technology

Identifiers

PMID39289420
PMCPMC11408652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.