ArticleScientific reports2024
Age-related analysis of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy Chinese individuals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myopia as a Global Public Health Challenge a Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Relationship Between Scheimpflug-Based Ocular Biomechanics and Myopia Progression in Adolescents.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Corvis ST analysis of underaged versus adults' healthy eyes with comparable tomography detects softer corneas in children and adolescents as opposed to adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Corneal biomechanics with CORVIS-ST in post-keratoplasty corneas.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Analysis of corneal biomechanical characteristics and clinical correlations in children with dust mite-allergic conjunctivitis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Changes in Ocular Biomechanics During Adolescence and Its Relationship with Lifestyle and Myopic Progression: The Oporto Myopia Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of astigmatism type influence onFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Lifestyle During School Years, Ocular Biomechanics and Refractive Status in Adult Myopes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Impact of veriflex and ICL on corneal biomechanics and endothelial cell density.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors of ocular hypertension: a case-control study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Ocular Impact Forces and Potential Complications in Pickleball-Related Eye Injuries.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Differences between suspected keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus via multiparameter analysis in Chinese populations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Correlation between corneal biomechanical and tomographic parameters in cataract patients.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of biomechanical indices measured by ocular response analyzer between children and elderly: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To report the correlation between corneal biomechanical parameters and age in healthy Chinese individuals. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 864 eyes of 543 healthy participants. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination and corneal biomechanics examination using Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST) were conducted. Based on age, all participants were further divided into five age groups (n) as follows: group A, 11-20 years (105); group B, 21-30 years (112); group C, 31-40 years (113); group D, 41-50 years (100); and group E, > 50 years (113). Using Corvis ST, we examined 35 corneal biomechanical parameters and compared them across the different age groups. Spearman's correlation coefficients and stepwise multivariate linear regression models were used to investigate whether the corneal biomechanical parameters were related to demographic and ocular characteristics. A correlation analysis between the left and right eyes revealed that 13 parameters were significantly associated with eye differences. Among the 35 corneal biomechanical parameters, 28 exhibited significant differences across the age groups, with stiffness parameter at applanation 1(SPA1) showing an upward trend after the age of 30 and stress-strain index (SSI) demonstrates a statistically significant upward trend when comparing the five age groups in the study. Additionally, Spearman's correlation analysis and stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that 11 corneal biomechanical parameters were positively correlated with age and 10 were negatively correlated with age. Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) was significantly negatively correlated with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT), SSI was significantly positively correlated with age and IOP, and SPA1 were positively correlated with IOP and CCT. In conclusion, most corneal biomechanical parameters showed a significant correlation with age, with corneal stiffness progressively increasing alongside advancing age, IOP, or CCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.