Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289330›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2025

Accurate Machine Learning-based Monitoring of Anesthesia Depth with EEG Recording.

Zhiyi Tu, Yuehan Zhang, Xueyang Lv, Yanyan Wang, Tingting Zhang, Juan Wang, Xinren Yu, Pei Chen, Suocheng Pang, Shengtian Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhiyi Tu *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Yuehan Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Xueyang Lv *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Yanyan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Tingting ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Juan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Xinren YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Pei ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Suocheng PangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Shengtian LiBio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Development and Neuropsychiatric Disorders (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-3802
Xiongjie YuDepartment of Anesthesia, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China. yuxiongj@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-2187
Xuan ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China. zhaoxuan301@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-8112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General anesthesia, pivotal for surgical procedures, requires precise depth monitoring to mitigate risks ranging from intraoperative awareness to postoperative cognitive impairments. Traditional assessment methods, relying on physiological indicators or behavioral responses, fall short of accurately capturing the nuanced states of unconsciousness. This study introduces a machine learning-based approach to decode anesthesia depth, leveraging EEG data across different anesthesia states induced by propofol and esketamine in rats. Our findings demonstrate the model's robust predictive accuracy, underscored by a novel intra-subject dataset partitioning and a 5-fold cross-validation method. The research diverges from conventional monitoring by utilizing anesthetic infusion rates as objective indicators of anesthesia states, highlighting distinct EEG patterns and enhancing prediction accuracy. Moreover, the model's ability to generalize across individuals suggests its potential for broad clinical application, distinguishing between anesthetic agents and their depths. Despite relying on rat EEG data, which poses questions about real-world applicability, our approach marks a significant advance in anesthesia monitoring.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralBrainElectroencephalographyIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMachine LearningAnimalsKetamineMalePropofolRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyKetaminePropofolAnesthesia monitoringElectroencephalogramKetamineMachine learningPropofol

Identifiers

PMID39289330
PMCPMC11876477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.