Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289300›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2025

ESR Essentials: imaging of suspected child abuse-practice recommendations by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology.

Gabrielle C Colleran, Maria Fossmark, Karen Rosendahl, Maria Argyropoulou, Kshitij Mankad, Amaka C Offiah

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabrielle C ColleranDepartment of Radiology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria FossmarkDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Karen RosendahlDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Maria ArgyropoulouDepartment of Clinical Radiology and Imaging, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Kshitij MankadDepartment of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Amaka C OffiahDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. a.offiah@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8991-5036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to provide a useful desktop reference for the imaging of suspected child abuse with clear, age-specific pathways for appropriate evidence-based imaging and follow-up. We aim to provide a road map for the imaging evaluation and follow-up of this important and vulnerable cohort of patients presenting with signs and symptoms concerning for inflicted injury. As the imaging recommendations differ for children of different ages, we provide a flowchart of the appropriate imaging pathway for infants, toddlers, and older children, which allows ease of selection of which children should undergo skeletal survey, non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain with 3-dimensional (D) reformats, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and whole spine. For ease of review, we include a table of the common intracranial and spinal patterns of injury in abusive head trauma. We summarise search patterns, areas of review, and key findings to include in the report. To exclude skeletal injury, infants and children under 2 years of age should undergo a full skeletal survey in accordance with national guidelines, with a limited follow-up skeletal survey performed 11-14 days later. For children over 2 years of age, the need for skeletal imaging should be decided on a case-by-case basis. All infants should undergo a non-contrast-enhanced CT brain with 3-D reformats. If this is normal with no abnormal neurology, then no further neuroimaging is required. If this is abnormal, then they should proceed to MRI brain and whole spine within 2-5 days. Children older than 1 year of age who have abnormal neurology and/or findings on skeletal survey that are suggestive of inflicted injury should undergo non-contrast CT brain with 3-D reformats and, depending on the findings, may also require MRI of the brain and whole spine. We hope that this will be a helpful contribution to the radiology literature, particularly for the general radiologist with low volumes of paediatrics in their practice, supporting them with managing these important cases when they arise in daily practice. KEY POINTS: The choice of initial imaging (skeletal survey and/or brain CT) depends on the age of the child in whom abuse is suspected. A follow-up skeletal survey is mandatory 11-14 days after the initial survey. If an MRI of the brain is performed, then an MRI of the whole spine should be performed concurrently.

Indexed as

Child AbusePediatricsChildChild, PreschoolEuropeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingSocieties, MedicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildClinical protocolsDiffuse axonal injuryFractures (bone)Physical abuse

Identifiers

PMID39289300
PMCPMC11914366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.