ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
An object numbering task reveals an underestimation of complexity for typically structured scenes.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Part-whole effects in visual number estimation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our visual environments are composed of an abundance of individual objects. The efficiency with which we can parse such rich environments is remarkable. Previous work suggests that this efficiency is partly explained by grouping mechanisms, which allow the visual system to process the objects that surround us as meaningful groups rather than individual entities. Here, we show that the grouping of objects in typically and meaningfully structured environments directly relates to a reduction of perceived complexity. In an object numerosity discrimination task, we showed participants pairs of schematic scene miniatures, in which objects were structured in typical or atypical ways and asked them to judge which scene consisted of more individual objects. Critically, participants underestimated the number of objects in typically structured compared with atypically structured scenes, suggesting that grouping based on typical object configurations reduces the perceived numerical complexity of a scene. In two control experiments, we show that this overestimation also occurs when the objects are presented on textured backgrounds, and that it is specific to upright scenes, indicating that it is not related to basic visual feature differences between typically and atypically structured scenes. Together, our results suggest that our visual surroundings appear less complex to the visual system than the number of objects in them makes us believe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.