Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289218›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2024

Utility guideline and considerations for the novel Hugo™ RAS (robotic-assisted surgery) system in colorectal surgery: surgical outcomes and initial experience in a tertiary center.

Antonio Arroyo, Ana Sánchez-Romero, Álvaro Soler-Silva, Saray Quinto, Francisco López-Rodríguez-Arias, María-José Alcaide, Mónica Serrano-Navidad, Elena Miranda, José-Luis Muñoz, Luis Sánchez-Guillén

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06512480 (Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06512480 recruitingnot on this map

Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsColorectal SurgeryArmscolonic resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antonio ArroyoColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain. aarroyo@umh.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-5175
Ana Sánchez-RomeroColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
Álvaro Soler-SilvaColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
Saray QuintoColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
Francisco López-Rodríguez-AriasColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
María-José AlcaideColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
Mónica Serrano-NavidadColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
Elena MirandaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
José-Luis MuñozDepartment of Anesthesiology, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.
Luis Sánchez-GuillénColorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche (Alicante), Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA novel robotic platform-Hugo™ RAS (robotic-assisted surgery) system-has been introduced with several innovations that may prove advantageous for surgeons, such as an open console and four interchangeable modular arms. Our study aims to evaluate this platform's safety, efficacy, and potential impact on the surgical treatment of colorectal pathology.

methodsPatients underwent robotic-assisted colorectal procedures with the Hugo™ RAS system at the General University Hospital of Elche from October 2023 to July 2024. Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative variables, and robotic technical issues were recorded.

resultsForty consecutive patients were included (14 right, 13 left, and 8 rectum neoplasms; 4 left diverticulitis; and 1 ileocecal Crohn's disease). The patients' characteristics were as follows: median age, 69.5 years; 24 males and 16 females; 45% ASA III-IV; and Charlson Comorbidity Index > 5:42.5%. We recorded four medical (2 anemia, 1 phlebitis, and 1 admission to the intensive care unit) and three surgical (1 hematoma of the incision, 1 intestinal occlusion, and 1 dehiscence of the anastomosis) postoperative complications. We had no conversions neither open nor laparoscopic surgery. The average hospital stay was 3 days, with no mortality or readmission.

conclusionsThe Hugo™ RAS system is safe and feasible for colorectal procedures. The modularity of the arms provides the versatility of configurations adjusted depending on the patient's body features and the surgeon's preferences and greater adaptability to operating rooms. The open console is highly comfortable and ergonomic for the surgeon, allowing communication with the operating room environment.

trial registrationNCT06512480.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal SurgeryFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeColorectal surgeryErgonomicsHugo™ RAS systemRobotic surgerySurgical innovations

Identifiers

PMID39289218
PMCPMC11408555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.