Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289199›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2024

Evaluation of the efficacy of polyethylene glycol in combination with different doses of linaclotide in a fractionated bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Wan-Qi Liu, Lei Shu, Xiaoli Zhou, Xiao-Feng Wang, Song Liu, Zhao-Hong Shi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wan-Qi LiuInstitute of Digestive Diseases, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Lei ShuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China.
Xiaoli ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China.
Xiao-Feng WangEzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Ezhou, 436001, Hubei Province, China.
Song LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China. 4598675@qq.com.
Zhao-Hong ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei Province, China. zhaohshi@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe ideal bowel cleansing program still needs to be explored. The aim was to compare the bowel cleansing effect and patient tolerance of low-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) combined with different doses of linaclotide in fractionated bowel preparation.

methodsThe subjects were randomly assigned to the 3LPEG group, 2LPEG + 2L group, or 2LPEG + L group. The primary outcome was to use the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS) to evaluate the efficacy of bowel cleansing, and the secondary outcomes were the detection rate of adenomas and polyps, adverse reactions, tolerance, and defecation dynamics; subsets of patients with chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome were also analyzed.

resultsA total of 753 patients were randomly assigned. In ITT analysis, the success of preparation of the 2LPEG + 2L group was better than that of the 2LPEG + L group or the 3LPEG group (92.0% vs. 82.3% vs. 82.1%; P = 0.002). Compared with the 3LPEG group, the 2LPEG + L group showed similar but non-inferior results (82.3% vs. 82.1%, P > 0.05). The 2LPEG + 2L group was similar to the 2LPEG + L group in terms of adverse reaction, tolerance, willingness to reuse, and sleep quality, but both were superior to the 3LPEG group. In a subgroup analysis of chronic constipation, the 2LPEG + 2L group had the best cleansing effect on the right colon and mid colon, while in the subgroup analysis of irritable bowel syndrome, the tolerance was better in the 2LPEG + 2L group and the 2LPEG + L group than the 3LPEG group.

conclusions2LPEG + 2L is a feasible bowel preparation regimen.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyPolyethylene GlycolsAdultAgedCatharticsConstipationDefecationDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedPeptidesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCatharticslinaclotidePeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsBowel preparationColonoscopyLinaclotidePolyethylene glycol

Identifiers

PMID39289199
PMCPMC11408392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.