Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289196›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Evaluating mechanical benefit of wedge osteotomies in endoscopic surgery for sagittal synostosis using patient-specific 3D-printed models.

J Taborsky, J Taborska, P Sova, K Maratova, A Kodytkova, V Benes, P Liby

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating mechanical benefit of wedge osteotomies in endoscopic surgery for sagittal synostosis using patient-specific 3D-printed models: Comment.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J TaborskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Prague, Czech Republic. jakub.taborsky@fnmotol.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-2600-7086
J TaborskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3901-2223
P SovaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0008-0681-444X
K MaratovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-8284
A KodytkovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0007-9281-4376
V BenesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-0392
P LibyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-795X

Funding

Charles University Grant Agency 32122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndoscopically assisted sagittal strip craniotomy with subsequent cranial orthosis is a frequently used surgical approach for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. Originally, this technique involved a wide sagittal strip craniectomy with bilateral wedge osteotomies. More recent studies suggest omitting wedge osteotomies, achieving similar outcomes. The controversy surrounding wedge osteotomies and our efforts to refine our technique led us to create models and evaluate the mechanical impact of wedge osteotomies.

methodsWe conducted a 3D-print study involving preoperative CT scans of non-syndromic scaphocephaly patients undergoing minimally invasive-assisted remodelation (MEAR) surgery. The sagittal strip collected during surgery underwent thickness measurement, along with a 3-point bending test. These results were used to determine printing parameters for accurately replicating the skull model. Model testing simulated gravitational forces during the postoperative course and assessed lateral expansion under various wedge osteotomy conditions.

resultsThe median sagittal strip thickness was 2.00 mm (range 1.35-3.46 mm) and significantly positively correlated (p = 0.037) with the median force (21.05 N) of the 3-point bending test. Model testing involving 40 models demonstrated that biparietal wedge osteotomies significantly reduced the force required for lateral bone shift, with a trend up to 5-cm-long cuts (p = 0.007). Additional cuts beyond this length or adding the occipital cut did not provide further significant advantage (p = 0.1643; p = 9.6381).

conclusionBiparietal wedge osteotomies reduce the force needed for lateral expansion, provide circumstances for accelerated head shape correction, and potentially reduce the duration of cranial orthosis therapy.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesOsteotomyPrinting, Three-DimensionalCraniotomyEndoscopyFemaleHumansInfantMaleModels, AnatomicTomography, X-Ray ComputedBarrel stave osteotomyCranial orthosisCraniosynostosisEndoscopically assistedScaphocephaly

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.