Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289087›Full record

ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024

Pressure Distributions in Glottal Geometries With Multichannel Airflows.

Ingo R Titze, Lynn Maxfield, Brian Manternach, Anil Palaparthi, Ronald Scherer, Xiaojian Wang, Xudong Zheng, Qian Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingo R TitzeUtah Center for Vocology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: ingo.titze@utah.edu.
Lynn MaxfieldUtah Center for Vocology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Brian ManternachUtah Center for Vocology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Anil PalaparthiUtah Center for Vocology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ronald SchererDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio.
Xiaojian WangCollege of Engineering and Computing, The University of Maine, Orono, Maine.
Xudong ZhengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.
Qian XueDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.

Funding

Voice Source and Airway Interation in Normal and Hyperfunctional SpeechR01DC017998 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TITZE, INGO R · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesComputer simulation of self-sustained oscillation of the vocal folds has been successful with application of simple Bernoulli-like driving pressures. As voice simulation is now applied to asymmetric vibration with complex mode structures that yield partial vocal fold contact, the driving pressures need refinement. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY: Two independent approaches were used to obtain pressure distributions. The first was a high-fidelity immersed-boundary method computation and the second was a series of pressure tap measurements on scaled-up physical models. Glottal geometries were based on normal surface modes of vibration. Samples are chosen from a large inventory of measured and calculated profiles.

resultsPressure distributions show the complexity that can exist in the driving forces on vocal fold surfaces. Qualitative similarity between computation and measurement was established for a variety of contact patterns, showing diverse pressure gradients in multiple directions.

conclusionsSimplified Bernoulli approaches to glottal pressure distributions are defensible when a single flow channel is preserved in vocal fold oscillation. However, when there are contact islands that produce confluence or difluence of multiple airflow channels, the pressure gradients vary profoundly. Small quantitative differences were observed between measurement and calculation, primarily due to spatial sampling.

Indexed as

Glottis—Glottal pressures—Voice simulation—Physical models—Bernoulli

Identifiers

PMID39289087
PMCPMC11910377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.