ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024
Pressure Distributions in Glottal Geometries With Multichannel Airflows.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the accuracy of one-dimensional glottal flow model in predicting voice production: comparison to experiments and three-dimensional flow simulations.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesComputer simulation of self-sustained oscillation of the vocal folds has been successful with application of simple Bernoulli-like driving pressures. As voice simulation is now applied to asymmetric vibration with complex mode structures that yield partial vocal fold contact, the driving pressures need refinement. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY: Two independent approaches were used to obtain pressure distributions. The first was a high-fidelity immersed-boundary method computation and the second was a series of pressure tap measurements on scaled-up physical models. Glottal geometries were based on normal surface modes of vibration. Samples are chosen from a large inventory of measured and calculated profiles.
resultsPressure distributions show the complexity that can exist in the driving forces on vocal fold surfaces. Qualitative similarity between computation and measurement was established for a variety of contact patterns, showing diverse pressure gradients in multiple directions.
conclusionsSimplified Bernoulli approaches to glottal pressure distributions are defensible when a single flow channel is preserved in vocal fold oscillation. However, when there are contact islands that produce confluence or difluence of multiple airflow channels, the pressure gradients vary profoundly. Small quantitative differences were observed between measurement and calculation, primarily due to spatial sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.