Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289029›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2024

Safety, pharmacokinetics, biomarker response and efficacy of E6742: a dual antagonist of Toll-like receptors 7 and 8, in a first in patient, randomised, double-blind, phase I/II study in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Yoshiya Tanaka, Atsushi Kumanogoh, Tatsuya Atsumi, Tomonori Ishii, Fumitoshi Tago, Mari Aoki, Shintaro Yamamuro, Shizuo Akira

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05278663 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-center, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of E6742 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05278663 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-center, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of E6742 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorEisai Co., Ltd.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled26ConditionsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicArmsE6742, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The SLC15A4-TASL complex is essential for lupus development in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yoshiya TanakaUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0807-7139
Atsushi KumanogohFaculty of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuya AtsumiDepartment of Rheumatology, Endocrinology, and Nephrology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5657-962X
Tomonori IshiiDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5361-5824
Fumitoshi TagoEisai Co Ltd, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1235-2244
Mari AokiEisai Co Ltd, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-7145-9125
Shintaro YamamuroEisai Co Ltd, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-0244-5385
Shizuo AkiraDepartment of Host Defense, Osaka University Immunology Frontier Research Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), biomarker response and efficacy of E6742 in a phase I/II study in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

methodsTwo sequential cohorts of patients with SLE were enrolled and randomised to 12 weeks of two times per day treatment with E6742 (100 or 200 mg; n=8 or 9) or placebo (n=9). The primary endpoint was safety, the secondary endpoints were PK and interferon gene signature (IGS), and the exploratory endpoints were efficacy and biomarker.

resultsThe proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 58.8% in the E6742 group (37.5% (3/8 patients) for 100 mg; 77.8% (7/9 patients) for 200 mg) and 66.7% (6/9 patients) in the placebo group. No Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events≥Grade 3 TEAEs occurred. PK parameters were similar to these in previous phase I studies in healthy adults. The IGS and levels of proinflammatory cytokines after ex-vivo challenge with a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist were immediately decreased by E6742 treatment. The response rate of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment at week 12 was 37.5% (3/8 patients) for E6742 100 mg, 57.1% (4/7 patients) for E6742 200 mg and 33.3% (3/9 patients) for placebo group.

conclusionsE6742 had a favourable safety profile and was well tolerated, with suppression of IGS responses and preliminary efficacy signals in patients with SLE. These results provide the first clinical evidence to support E6742 in the treatment of SLE, and support larger, longer-term clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05278663.

Indexed as

BiomarkersLupus Erythematosus, SystemicToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 8AdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersTLR7 protein, humanTLR8 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 8autoimmunityimmune system diseaseslupus erythematosus, systemictherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID39289029
PMCPMC11409405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.