ArticleBMJ open2024
Exoskeletal-assisted walking combined with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation to improve bone health in persons with spinal cord injury: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03096197 (Exoskeleton and Spinal Cord Stimulation for SCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Exoskeleton and Spinal Cord Stimulation for SCI
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effect of device-based neuromodulation on the motor recovery of patients with spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2025Pooled it
- Disuse Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury: Scope and Challenges, Potential Mechanisms, Treatment, and Future Directions.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPersons with non-ambulatory spinal cord injury (SCI) undergo immediate unloading of the skeleton and, as a result, have marked loss of bone mineral density below the level of lesion that is directly associated with increased risk of long-bone fractures. There is a paucity of research that has successfully implemented rehabilitation and/or exercise training interventions to mitigate bone loss after acute SCI or reverse bone loss that has already occurred in chronic SCI. This paper describes a research protocol to compare the effect of exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW) alone versus EAW plus transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (EAW+tSCS) on bone density, geometry and strength in a cohort of chronic SCI participants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: After meeting eligibility criteria and completing baseline testing, sixteen participants will be block randomised into the EAW alone group or the EAW+tSCS combined group (n=8 each group). Each group will receive a total of 108 overground training sessions (60 min sessions, 3 times a week, for 36 weeks) for the 9-month training period. Imaging for bone density and geometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative CT will be performed prior to starting the intervention (baseline), after 72 training sessions, and again after 108 sessions in each of the intervention arms. CT imaging of both lower extremities will be performed at baseline and at the 9-month time point in each of the intervention arms. Finite element models of bone loading will be generated based on three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of bone architecture from CT imaging prior to and 9 months after the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is currently approved by the Kessler Foundation and James J. Peters VA Medical Center Institutional Review Board. A member of the research team will review and explain the study consent form and will have all eligible participants sign prior to participation in the study. Results from this study will be disseminated to clinicians and researchers in the SCI community at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03096197.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.