ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2024
Large lungs in divers: a risk for pulmonary barotrauma?
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Divers with large or normal lungs: is the difference justified?Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study analysed a series of investigations on lung function in military divers and the importance of computed tomography (CT) scans concerning fitness to dive. We examined the incidence of blebs and bullae in a population of military divers with large lungs prompted by six cases of pulmonary barotrauma. All of these divers' medicals were normal apart from having large lungs (FVC > 120% predicted). A subsequent survey of the database of all divers and submariners of the Royal Netherlands Navy (RNLN) found another 72 divers/submariners with large lungs who were then evaluated by a CT scan. This resulted in the identification of three further individuals with blebs and/or bullae, who were then declared unfit to dive. In total, the incidence of these lung abnormalities in this cohort was 11.5%. We discuss the possible consequences for fitness to dive with regard to the current literature on the subject, and also consider the most recent standards of reference values for pulmonary function indices. Based on our results and additional insights from other studies, we advise using the Global Lung Initiative reference values for pulmonary function, while performing high resolution CT scans only in divers with clinical indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.