ArticlePhysiology & behavior2024
Neonatal paw pricking alters adolescent behavior in a sex-dependent manner and sucrose partially remediates the effects.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonatal exposure to noxious stimuli such as repeated heel lances can cause behavior changes. In the NICU sucrose given prior to procedures attenuates the immediate behavioral response to noxious stimuli but may not ameliorate the long-term consequences, and treatment with 24 % sucrose can brain structure and behavior in adult rodents. We used a rat model to determine whether paw pricks during the neonatal period alter social interaction and/or paw withdrawal thresholds (PWT) in adolescence, and if 7 % sucrose mitigates these effects. One male and one female pup per litter was assigned to each of six experimental groups (no paw prick (control), 1 paw prick (1PP), or 2PP, ± sucrose). Hind paws were pricked once or twice each day between postnatal day (P)3 and P10. Social behavior and PWT were tested in adolescence using the modified social interaction test and von Frey filaments, respectively. Social behavior was altered in the 2PP group; total time interacting was lower in 2PP rats, primarily due to less time sniffing a play partner. Sucrose did not mitigate effects of paw prick but trended to alter social behaviors in males; it decreased time in contact but increased social motivation (movement toward a play partner). PWTs were higher in 2PP animals, this was not altered by sucrose. Thus, rat pups exposed to paw pricks in the neonatal period have some altered behaviors in adolescence. The nature of the behavioral changes is sex-dependent, but sucrose did not mitigate these changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.