Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288407›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

A Behavior-Based Model to Validate Electronic Systems Designed to Collect Patient-Reported Outcomes: Model Development and Application.

Sultan Attamimi, Zoe Marshman, Christopher Deery, Stephen Radley, Fiona Gilchrist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sultan Attamimi *Academic Unit of Oral Health Dentistry and Society, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1994-6985
Zoe Marshman *Academic Unit of Oral Health Dentistry and Society, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-9637
Christopher Deery *Academic Unit of Oral Health Dentistry and Society, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7526-7736
Stephen Radley *Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3980-7712
Fiona Gilchrist *Academic Unit of Oral Health Dentistry and Society, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-6274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe merits of technology have been adopted in capturing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by incorporating PROs into electronic systems. Following the development of an electronic system, evaluation of system performance is crucial to ensuring the collection of meaningful data. In contemporary PRO literature, electronic system validation is overlooked, and evidence on validation methods is lacking.

objectiveThis study aims to introduce a generalized concept to guide electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) providers in planning for system-specific validation methods.

methodsSince electronic systems are essentially products of software engineering endeavors, electronic systems used to collect PRO should be viewed from a computer science perspective with consideration to the health care environment. On this basis, a testing model was blueprinted and applied to a newly developed ePRO system designed for clinical use in pediatric dentistry (electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Paediatric Dentistry) to investigate its thoroughness.

resultsA behavior-based model of ePRO system validation was developed based on the principles of user acceptance testing and patient-centered care. The model allows systematic inspection of system specifications and identification of technical errors through simulated positive and negative usage pathways in open and closed environments. The model was able to detect 15 positive errors with 1 unfavorable response when applied to electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire-Paediatric Dentistry system testing.

conclusionsThe application of the behavior-based model to a newly developed ePRO system showed a high ability for technical error detection in a systematic fashion. The proposed model will increase confidence in the validity of ePRO systems as data collection tools in future research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansSurveys and Questionnaireselectronic PROelectronic PROspaediatric dentistrypatient-reported outcomepatient-reported outcomesPROsystem validationuser acceptanceuser acceptance testingvalidation model

Identifiers

PMID39288407
PMCPMC11445622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.