ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024
Early Prediction of Cardiac Arrest in the Intensive Care Unit Using Explainable Machine Learning: Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Identifying the factors influencing long-term care utilization by older adults in China: machine learning analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Usability Evaluation of a Central Monitoring System with AI-Based Cardiac Arrest Prediction in the ICU.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Early Prediction of Cardiac Arrest Based on Time-Series Vital Signs Using Deep Learning: Retrospective Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of AI and Augmented Reality in Cardiovascular Disease Management: A Narrative Review.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning-based model for predicting carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based predictive tools and nomogram for in-hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients: development and external validation using retrospective cohorts.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Machine Learning for the Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Predicting ICU Mortality Among Septic Patients Using Machine Learning Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Association of mean corpuscular volume with 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: A retrospective cohort study using eICU data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based early warning system for hemodynamic deterioration in cardiovascular ICU patients: a bidirectional cross-validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Early prediction cardiac arrest in intensive care units: the value of laboratory indicator trends.World journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrest (CA) is one of the leading causes of death among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although many CA prediction models with high sensitivity have been developed to anticipate CA, their practical application has been challenging due to a lack of generalization and validation. Additionally, the heterogeneity among patients in different ICU subtypes has not been adequately addressed.
objectiveThis study aims to propose a clinically interpretable ensemble approach for the timely and accurate prediction of CA within 24 hours, regardless of patient heterogeneity, including variations across different populations and ICU subtypes. Additionally, we conducted patient-independent evaluations to emphasize the model's generalization performance and analyzed interpretable results that can be readily adopted by clinicians in real-time.
methodsPatients were retrospectively analyzed using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) and the eICU-Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). To address the problem of underperformance, we constructed our framework using feature sets based on vital signs, multiresolution statistical analysis, and the Gini index, with a 12-hour window to capture the unique characteristics of CA. We extracted 3 types of features from each database to compare the performance of CA prediction between high-risk patient groups from MIMIC-IV and patients without CA from eICU-CRD. After feature extraction, we developed a tabular network (TabNet) model using feature screening with cost-sensitive learning. To assess real-time CA prediction performance, we used 10-fold leave-one-patient-out cross-validation and a cross-data set method. We evaluated MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD across different cohort populations and subtypes of ICU within each database. Finally, external validation using the eICU-CRD and MIMIC-IV databases was conducted to assess the model's generalization ability. The decision mask of the proposed method was used to capture the interpretability of the model.
resultsThe proposed method outperformed conventional approaches across different cohort populations in both MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD. Additionally, it achieved higher accuracy than baseline models for various ICU subtypes within both databases. The interpretable prediction results can enhance clinicians' understanding of CA prediction by serving as a statistical comparison between non-CA and CA groups. Next, we tested the eICU-CRD and MIMIC-IV data sets using models trained on MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD, respectively, to evaluate generalization ability. The results demonstrated superior performance compared with baseline models.
conclusionsOur novel framework for learning unique features provides stable predictive power across different ICU environments. Most of the interpretable global information reveals statistical differences between CA and non-CA groups, demonstrating its utility as an indicator for clinical decisions. Consequently, the proposed CA prediction system is a clinically validated algorithm that enables clinicians to intervene early based on CA prediction information and can be applied to clinical trials in digital health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.