Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288403›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Requirement Analysis of Different Variants of a Measurement and Training Station for Older Adults at Risk of Malnutrition and Reduced Mobility: Focus Group Study.

Lisa Happe, Marie Sgraja, Vincent Quinten, Mareike Förster, Rebecca Diekmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa HappeJunior Research Group "Nutrition and Physical Function in Older Adults", Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-5437
Marie SgrajaJunior Research Group "Nutrition and Physical Function in Older Adults", Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-9927
Vincent QuintenJunior Research Group "Nutrition and Physical Function in Older Adults", Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7770-9884
Mareike FörsterJunior Research Group "Nutrition and Physical Function in Older Adults", Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-0354-5745
Rebecca DiekmannJunior Research Group "Nutrition and Physical Function in Older Adults", Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-3832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemographic change is leading to an increasing proportion of older people in the German population and requires new approaches for prevention and rehabilitation to promote the independence and health of older people. Technical assistance systems can offer a promising solution for the early detection of nutritional and physical deficits and the initiation of appropriate interventions. Such a system should combine different components, such as devices for assessing physical and nutritional status, educational elements on these topics, and training and feedback options. The concept is that the whole system can be used independently by older adults (aged ≥70 years) for monitoring and early detection of problems in nutrition or physical function, as well as providing opportunities for intervention.

objectiveThis study aims to develop technical and digital elements for a measurement and training station (MuTs) with an associated app. Through focus group discussions, target group requirements, barriers, and favorable components for such a system were identified.

methodsOlder adults (aged ≥70 years) were recruited from a community-based setting as well as from a geriatric rehabilitation center. Focus group interviews were conducted between August and November 2022. Following a semistructured interview guideline, attitudes, requirements, preferences, and barriers for the MuTs were discussed. Discussions were stimulated by videos, demonstrations of measuring devices, and participants' ratings of the content presented using rankings. After conducting 1 focus group in the rehabilitation center and 2 in the community, the interview guide was refined, making a more detailed discussion of identified elements and aspects possible. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using content analysis.

resultsA total of 21 older adults (female participants: n=11, 52%; mean age 78.5, SD 4.6 years) participated in 5 focus group discussions. There was a strong interest in the independent measurement of health parameters, such as pulse and hand grip strength, especially among people with health problems who would welcome feedback on their health development. Participants emphasized the importance of personal guidance and interaction before using the device, as well as the need for feedback mechanisms and personalized training for everyday use. Balance and coordination were mentioned as preferred training areas in a MuTs. New training options that motivate and invite people to participate could increase willingness to use the MuTs.

conclusionsThe target group is generally open and interested in tracking and optimizing diet and physical activity. A general willingness to use a MuTs independently was identified, as well as a compelling need for guidance and feedback on measurement and training to be part of the station.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsMalnutritionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentGermanyHumansMaleMobility LimitationNutritional Statusdietgerontechnologyhealth dataphysical activityqualitative researchtechnical assistance system

Identifiers

PMID39288403
PMCPMC11445625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.