Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288352›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Survival Between Black and White Women According to Tumor Subtype: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Juliana M Torres, Michelle O Sodipo, Margaret F Hopkins, Paulette D Chandler, Erica T Warner

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sociodemographic Disparities in First-Line Treatment and Outcome Patterns in Women with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliana M TorresDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, CURE Program, Boston, MA.
Michelle O SodipoDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5001-7298
Margaret F HopkinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3871-5066
Paulette D ChandlerDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4213-1215
Erica T WarnerClinical Translational Epidemiology Unit, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2671-0313

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Young Empowered Scientists for ContinUed Research Engagement (YES for CURE)R25CA221738 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI DECAPRIO, JAMES A. · 2017 to 2023
$2.1M
Race/Ethnicity and Mammographic Density: Genetic and Lifestyle FactorsK01CA188075 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WARNER, ERICA T · 2014 to 2017
$518k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA188075NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA221738NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite effective early-detection approaches and innovative treatments, Black women in the United States have higher breast cancer mortality rates compared with White women. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the extent of disparities in breast cancer survival between Black and White women according to tumor subtype.

methodsA comprehensive database search was performed for full-text, English-language articles published from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2022. Included studies compared survival between Black and White female patients with breast cancer within subtypes defined by hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu (HER2; now known as ERBB2) status. Random-effects models were used to combine study-specific results and generate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer-specific or overall survival (OS). A protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021268212).

resultsEighteen studies including 228,885 (34,262 Black; 182,466 White) patients with breast cancer were identified. Compared with White women, Black women had a higher risk of breast cancer death for all tumor subtypes. The summary risk of breast cancer death was 50% higher among hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative [HER2-] tumors (RR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.72]), 34% higher for hormone receptor+/HER2+ (RR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.64]), 20% higher for hormone receptor-negative (-)/HER2+ (RR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.43]), and 17% higher among individuals with hormone receptor-/HER2- tumors (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.25). Black women also had poorer OS than White women for all subtypes.

conclusionThese results suggest there are both subtype-specific and subtype-independent mechanisms that contribute to disparities in breast cancer survival between Black and White women, which require multilevel interventions to address and achieve health equity.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsWhiteErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansUnited StatesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID39288352
PMCPMC11540747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.