Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288310›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Biomedical knowledge graph-optimized prompt generation for large language models.

Karthik Soman, Peter W Rose, John H Morris, Rabia E Akbas, Brett Smith, Braian Peetoom, Catalina Villouta-Reyes, Gabriel Cerono, Yongmei Shi, Angela Rizk-Jackson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Large Language Models in Bio-Ontology Research: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Karthik SomanDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Peter W RoseSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, United States.
John H MorrisDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0290-7979
Rabia E AkbasDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Brett SmithInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Braian PeetoomDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Catalina Villouta-ReyesDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Gabriel CeronoDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Yongmei ShiBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Angela Rizk-JacksonBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Sharat IsraniBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Charlotte A NelsonMate Bioservices, Inc. Swallowtail Ct., Brisbane, CA 94005, United States.
Sui HuangInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3545-4665
Sergio E BaranziniDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0067-194X

Funding

EVIDARA: Automated Evidential Support from Raw Data for relay agents in Biomedical KG QueriesOT2TR003450 · NCATS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI BARANZINI, SERGIO E, HUANG, SUI · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
National Science Foundation NSF_2033569NCATS NIH HHS OT2 TR003450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLarge language models (LLMs) are being adopted at an unprecedented rate, yet still face challenges in knowledge-intensive domains such as biomedicine. Solutions such as pretraining and domain-specific fine-tuning add substantial computational overhead, requiring further domain-expertise. Here, we introduce a token-optimized and robust Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) framework by leveraging a massive biomedical KG (SPOKE) with LLMs such as Llama-2-13b, GPT-3.5-Turbo, and GPT-4, to generate meaningful biomedical text rooted in established knowledge.

resultsCompared to the existing RAG technique for Knowledge Graphs, the proposed method utilizes minimal graph schema for context extraction and uses embedding methods for context pruning. This optimization in context extraction results in more than 50% reduction in token consumption without compromising the accuracy, making a cost-effective and robust RAG implementation on proprietary LLMs. KG-RAG consistently enhanced the performance of LLMs across diverse biomedical prompts by generating responses rooted in established knowledge, accompanied by accurate provenance and statistical evidence (if available) to substantiate the claims. Further benchmarking on human curated datasets, such as biomedical true/false and multiple-choice questions (MCQ), showed a remarkable 71% boost in the performance of the Llama-2 model on the challenging MCQ dataset, demonstrating the framework's capacity to empower open-source models with fewer parameters for domain-specific questions. Furthermore, KG-RAG enhanced the performance of proprietary GPT models, such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. In summary, the proposed framework combines explicit and implicit knowledge of KG and LLM in a token optimized fashion, thus enhancing the adaptability of general-purpose LLMs to tackle domain-specific questions in a cost-effective fashion. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SPOKE KG can be accessed at https://spoke.rbvi.ucsf.edu/neighborhood.html. It can also be accessed using REST-API (https://spoke.rbvi.ucsf.edu/swagger/). KG-RAG code is made available at https://github.com/BaranziniLab/KG_RAG. Biomedical benchmark datasets used in this study are made available to the research community in the same GitHub repository.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID39288310
PMCPMC11441322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.