Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288256›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Identifying dose constraints for the parotid ducts to minimize patient-reported xerostomia: Is conventional mean dose sparing of the parotid glands sufficient?

Manal Ahmidouch, Shiva K Das, Tong Zhu, Colette Shen, Lawrence B Marks, Bhishamjit S Chera, David V Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manal AhmidouchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Shiva K DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tong ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Colette ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Lawrence B MarksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Bhishamjit S CheraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
David V FriedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe aim of this study was to identify dose constraints for the parotid ducts that limit patient-reported xerostomia and estimate whether these constraints are achieved during conventional parotid gland sparing radiation therapy (PGS-RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients were treated prospectively on trial with MRI sialography-guided parotid duct sparing radiation therapy (PDS-RT). PDS-RT explicitly minimizes dose to the parotid ducts in addition to PGS-RT. Parotid duct dose constraints were identified that distinguished patients reporting high and low rates of xerostomia. Atlas-based parotid duct contours were generated on a retrospective cohort of similar patients where the parotid ducts were not contoured nor explicitly spared to estimate the dose received by the parotid ducts during PGS-RT.

resultsPatients whose intraglandular parotid ducts or total parotid ducts were planned for a mean dose < 14 Gy and < 12 Gy, respectively, reported significantly (p < 0.01) lower rates of xerostomia at 6 and 12 months post-RT. Patients receiving PDS-RT had average total and intraglandular duct doses of 11.6  and 13.6 Gy, respectively, compared to an estimated 23.8  and 22.1 Gy, for those receiving PGS-RT (p < 0.01). Only 6% (6/108) and 20% (22/108) of patients receiving PGS-RT were estimated to meet the dose constraints for the total ducts and intraglandular ducts, respectively.

conclusionParotid duct dose thresholds exist that appear to distinguish patients with and without xerostomia. The identified dose thresholds are frequently not met in PGS-RT plans. In addition to reducing the dose to the parotid gland(s), parotid duct sparing may also further reduce xerostomia.

Indexed as

Organs at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsParotid GlandRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedXerostomiaAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisdose constraintIMRTparotidxerostomia

Identifiers

PMID39288256
PMCPMC11633803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.