ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024
HaploSweep: Detecting and Distinguishing Recent Soft and Hard Selective Sweeps through Haplotype Structure.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing detection of polygenic adaptation: a comparative study of machine learning and statistical approaches using simulated evolve-and-resequence data.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Haplotype and diversity signatures of ultra-soft selective sweeps in HIV-1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Fast and Memory-Efficient Dynamic Programming Approach for Large-Scale EHH-Based Selection Scans.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Fast and Memory-Efficient Dynamic Programming Approach for Large-Scale EHH-Based Selection Scans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Polaris: Polarization of ancestral and derived polymorphic alleles for inferences of extended haplotype homozygosity in human populations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Green revolution gene drives adaptation of Arabidopsis to the extremely high altitude.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying soft selective sweeps using genomic data is a challenging yet crucial task in population genetics. In this study, we present HaploSweep, a novel method for detecting and categorizing soft and hard selective sweeps based on haplotype structure. Through simulations spanning a broad range of selection intensities, softness levels, and demographic histories, we demonstrate that HaploSweep outperforms iHS, nSL, and H12 in detecting soft sweeps. HaploSweep achieves high classification accuracy-0.9247 for CHB, 0.9484 for CEU, and 0.9829 YRI-when applied to simulations in line with the human Out-of-Africa demographic model. We also observe that the classification accuracy remains consistently robust across different demographic models. Additionally, we introduce a refined method to accurately distinguish soft shoulders adjacent to hard sweeps from soft sweeps. Application of HaploSweep to genomic data of CHB, CEU, and YRI populations from the 1000 genomes project has led to the discovery of several new genes that bear strong evidence of population-specific soft sweeps (HRNR, AMBRA1, CBFA2T2, DYNC2H1, and RANBP2 etc.), with prevalent associations to immune functions and metabolic processes. The validated performance of HaploSweep, demonstrated through both simulated and real data, underscores its potential as a valuable tool for detecting and comprehending the role of soft sweeps in adaptive evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.