Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39288152›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2025

Pain is Modulated Differently Between Females With and Without Patellofemoral Pain: Factors Related to Sensitization.

Kemery J Sigmund, Marie K Hoeger Bement, Wendy E Huddleston, Kyle T Ebersole, Jennifer E Earl-Boehm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Idiopathic anterior knee pain-what is the problem?]Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kemery J SigmundSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Marie K Hoeger BementDepartment of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
Wendy E HuddlestonSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Kyle T EbersoleSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Jennifer E Earl-BoehmSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPatellofemoral pain (PFP) has poor long-term recovery outcomes. Central sensitization describes central nervous system changes altering pain modulation, which can complicate recovery (poorer prognosis and worse function). Signs of central sensitization include amplified pain facilitation, pain hypersensitivity, and impaired pain inhibition, which can be measured with temporal summation of pain (TSP), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), respectively. Sex differences exist for these test responses, but female-only PFP investigations of sensitization are uncommon. Understanding pain modulation in females with PFP could improve treatment protocols.

objectiveTo determine whether females with PFP exhibit signs of central sensitization (greater TSP, lower PPTs, and reduced CPM) compared with pain-free females.

designCross-sectional study.

settingLaboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsThirty-three females ([20 PFP, 13 pain free]; age: PFP 29.2 ± 7 years, pain free 28 ± 7 years; height: PFP 166.7 ± 5.9 cm, pain free 166 ± 9.5 cm; mass: PFP 66.7 ± 9.6 kg, pain free 69.3 ± 7.5 kg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Temporal summation of pain was assessed with 10 punctate stimuli applied to the knee and calculated by the difference in pain intensity between beginning and end responses. Pressure pain thresholds were tested at 4 sites (3 for local hypersensitivity [knee] and 1 for widespread hypersensitivity [hand]). Conditioned pain modulation was conducted by comparing PPTs during 2 conditions (baseline and ice immersion). Conditioned pain modulation response was defined as the percent difference between conditions. Between-groups differences in TSP response were analyzed with a Welch test. Separate Welch tests analyzed group comparisons of PPTs and CPM responses at 4 sites.

resultsFemales with PFP exhibited greater TSP response (P = .019) and lower CPM response at patella center (P = .010) and hand sites (P = .007) than pain-free females. Pressure pain thresholds group differences were not observed at any site (P > .0125).

conclusionsFemales with PFP modulate pain differently than pain-free females. Clinicians should recognize signs of central sensitization and their potential effect on treatment options.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationPain ThresholdPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPressureYoung Adultanterior knee paincentral sensitizationconditioned pain modulationpressure pain thresholdsquantitative sensory testingtemporal summation

Identifiers

PMID39288152
PMCPMC11866792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.