ArticleJAMA network open2024
Chronic Illness and Quality of Life 5 Years After Displacement Among Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Where We Can Breathe Together': Home Perceptions and Coping Strategies of Divorced Mothers Evacuated in Wartime.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2026Article
- Epidemiological pattern of death and causes of death in registered immigrants of Northeast Iran during the 2013-2023: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Physical activity levels and associated factors among Rohingya older adults living in the refugee camp in Bangladesh.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Depression, anxiety, and medication adherence among Sudanese refugees with chronic illnesses in Aftit refugee camp, northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.Global health action · 2025Article
- Prevalence and determinants of quality of life among Rohingya older adults residing in the refugee camp in Bangladesh.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Chronic disease patients during the armed conflict in Sudan: a cross-sectional study on mental health and quality of life.Conflict and health · 2025Article
- Error in Author Information.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Coastal residency and its association with diagnosed hypertension based on findings from a cross-sectional study in rural Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Palliative care needs and quality of life among adults with advanced chronic illnesses in low-income communities of Bangladesh.BMC palliative care · 2025Observational
- Article
- The impact of health literacy on quality of life in patients with chronic diseases.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Vulnerabilities of Rohingya and host community children in Bangladesh: A qualitative study on child labor, well-being, and the impact of COVID-19.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Health-related quality of life and associated factors among older refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh residing in Kotayk province of Armenia.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Assessment of sex disparities in prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: results from the Bangladesh demographic and health survey data.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Article
- Editorial: World refugee day 2023.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Rohingya refugees, forcibly displaced from Myanmar, face challenges adapting to Bangladesh. Examining their quality of life (QOL) is vital to identifying nuanced factors associated with their well-being, informing targeted interventions for an improved QOL. Objectives: To identify the QOL among Rohingya refugees 5 years after migration to Bangladesh, with a particular emphasis on understanding the complex interplay between sociodemographic factors and chronic illnesses. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study involving resettled Rohingya adults was conducted between May 18 and July 7, 2021, approximately 5 years after their resettlement in Bangladesh. Of the participants, 500 individuals were healthy, whereas 558 individuals were undergoing treatment for at least 1 chronic disease. Data were analyzed from January to February 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study assessed QOL using the short version of the World Health Organization's QOL Questionnaire, covering 4 domains: physical, psychological, social, and environmental. Scores were transformed to a maximum of 100. Tobit linear regression, adjusted for potential confounders, was employed for analysis. Results: The study included a total of 1058 respondents, who were predominantly female (630 participants [59.5%]) and had a mean (SD) age of 42.5 (16.1) years. Despite being healthy, individuals without chronic illnesses had median QOL scores ranging from 44 to 56 out of 100, indicating a relatively poor QOL. A total of 260 participants (46.6%) with chronic diseases reported very poor or poor QOL, in contrast to 58 healthy individuals (11.6%) in the fifth year after displacement. Specifically, patients with cancer and those who had multimorbidity exhibited the lowest QOL scores across all domains, with significant reductions in the physical health (10.57 decrease; 95% CI, -12.97 to -8.17) and psychological domain scores (7.20 decrease; 95% CI, -9.71 to -5.93) according to Tobit regression analysis. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that chronic illnesses were associated with all domains of QOL among Rohingya refugees, particularly those with musculoskeletal disorders, cancer, and multimorbid conditions. This heightened vulnerability may contribute to poor QOL in this population. By uncovering these disparities, the study lays the groundwork for targeted interventions and policies aligned with the United Nations' goal of leaving no one behind in sustainable development efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.