ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Comparison of Hemodynamic Performance, Three-Dimensional Flow Fields, and Turbulence Levels for Three Different Heart Valves at Three Different Hemodynamic Conditions.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulations predict improved valve performance without direct leaflet intervention after neonatal truncus arteriosus repair.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Simultaneous 3D Quantification of Fluid-Structure Interaction in a Patient-Averaged Left Ventricle: A Lagrangian Experimental Framework.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Measurement of turbulent kinetic energy with colour Doppler echocardiography and particle tracing velocimetry in an ex-vivo aortic stenosis model.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Haemodynamic Performance of Transcatheter Heart Valve in Bileaflet Mechanical Valve: An In-vitro Study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valve: advances in clinical and hemodynamics research.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Influence of valve size on the hemodynamic performance of a tissue-engineered valved conduit in pulmonary position.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hemodynamic performance of different prosthetic heart valves is difficult to compare among studies due to a variety of test conditions and experimental techniques. Existing studies are typically limited to one family of valves (biological or mechanical) and testing conditions of 5l/min and often lack sufficient spatial resolution. To address these limitations, a pulse duplicator with a multi-view imaging system (Tomo-PIV) was employed to investigate the three-dimensional flow field in the aortic root of three different valves: a tri-leaflet mechanical heart valve (TRIFLO, Novostia), a bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve (On-X, Artivion), and a biological heart valve (Perimount, Edwards Lifesciences). The valves were tested at low (3 l/min), normal (5 l/min), and elevated (7 l/min) cardiac output
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.