Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287897›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2024

Real-world Effectiveness of Sarilumab in RA: Results from the Open-label, Prospective, Single-arm Observational PROFILE Study.

Alan Kivitz, Jacques Eric Gottenberg, Martin Bergman, Chunfu Qiu, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Ron de Nijs, Louis Bessette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alan KivitzAltoona Centre for Clinical Research, 175 Meadowbrook Lane, Duncansville, PA, 16635-8445, USA. ajkivitz@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1045-1310
Jacques Eric GottenbergDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpitaux de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France.
Martin BergmanDepartment of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chunfu QiuSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Hubert van HoogstratenSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Ron de NijsDepartment of Rheumatology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands.
Louis BessetteDepartment of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 1-year PROspective sarilumab (preFILled syringe/pen) multinational, obsErvational (PROFILE) study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of sarilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsSafety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and lab abnormalities. Effectiveness endpoints included the ACR core set. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). All statistics are descriptive and p values were nominal.

resultsIn total, 595 patients were treated, of whom 223 (37.5%) received sarilumab monotherapy and 372 (62.5%) received combination therapy. Upon initiation of sarilumab, an improvement in the mean (SD) CDAI score was observed at week 24 [11.4 (10.3)] and was maintained through week 52 [10.0 (10.5)], resulting in a mean [SD] reduction of -14.9 (12.7) and -14.4 (12.9), respectively. There were consistent improvements in disease activity that were similar for patients on monotherapy vs. combination therapy. An increase in the proportion of patients achieving remission and low disease activity was reported. By week 52, both groups had improved physical function and quality of life. There were no new safety signals. The proportions of any patients reporting a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) or serious treatment-emergent AE (SAE) was 66.2% and 5.9%, respectively, and were similar between both treatment groups. Overall, 15.6% of patients discontinued sarilumab treatment due to TEAEs. The most commonly reported TEAE of interest was neutropenia (14.1%).

conclusionsIn this 1-year, observational real-world study, sarilumab therapy resulted in improved clinical outcomes. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in sarilumab randomized clinical trials. This study was entered on the German website (Paul Ehrlich Institute) on January 11, 2018, with NIS No.: 423.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic agentsPatient-reported outcome measuresQuality of lifeReal-worldRheumatoid arthritisSarilumab

Identifiers

PMID39287897
PMCPMC11557782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.