Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287893›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2024

Evaluation of ballistics euthanasia applied to stranded cetaceans using ethological and post-mortem computed tomography assessment.

Rebecca M Boys, Brian C W Kot, Gordon Lye, Ngaio J Beausoleil, Stuart Hunter, Karen A Stockin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca M BoysCetacean Ecology Research Group, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland, New Zealand. r.boys@massey.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6427-800X
Brian C W KotDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-1884
Gordon LyeAnimal Referral Centre, 224 Albany Highway, Schnapper Rock, Auckland, 0632, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2096-4128
Ngaio J BeausoleilAnimal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, School of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-0460
Stuart HunterSchool of Veterinary Science, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Karen A StockinCetacean Ecology Research Group, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102-904, Auckland, New Zealand. k.a.stockin@massey.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-3983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Debilitated stranded cetaceans with low survival likelihood, may require euthanasia to avoid further suffering. Euthanasia can involve chemical or physical methods, including ballistics. Ballistics should cause instantaneous, permanent insensibility through brainstem disruption. Despite wide application, there is limited understanding of ballistics-related welfare outcomes. We opportunistically examined behaviour of three maternally-dependent cetaceans following shooting and the related cranial disruption post-mortem using computed tomography (PMCT). Our aim was to understand whether a 'humane death', i.e., euthanasia, was achieved. Each animal was shot using different projectile types: soft non-bonded, solid, and soft bonded. In two animals, insensibility was not immediately assessed following shooting, although both were reported as 'instantaneously insensible'. From our analysis, all animals displayed musculoskeletal responses to shooting, including peduncle stiffening and slack lower jaw, followed by musculature relaxation 24-, 10.3- and 20.8-seconds post-ballistics, respectively. The animal shot with a soft non-bonded projectile also displayed agonal convulsions and tail-lifting for 16-seconds post-shot; these were not observed for solid or soft bonded projectiles. PMCT findings indicated projectile disruption to the brainstem and/or spinal cord likely to cause near-instantaneous insensibility. However, extra-cranial wounding was also evident for the soft non-bonded projectile, highlighting potential for additional welfare compromise. Our results demonstrate that ballistics can achieve a relatively rapid death in young, stranded cetaceans, but careful equipment selection is required. To ensure a humane death, verification of insensibility must be undertaken immediately following shooting. Further studies should be undertaken to improve knowledge of appropriate procedures and equipment for euthanasia, ensuring humane deaths for compromised cetaceans.

Indexed as

Euthanasia, AnimalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsAnimal WelfareFemaleForensic BallisticsMalePostmortem ImagingWounds, GunshotBehaviourEuthaniseInsensibilityOdontoceteStrandingWelfare

Identifiers

PMID39287893
PMCPMC11538159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.