ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024
Application of machine learning algorithms to predict postoperative surgical site infections and surgical site occurrences following inguinal hernia surgery.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in abdominal wall hernia surgery: clinical applications and translational readiness.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Spine Surgery Duration.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of increased healthcare utilization in colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Predicting operative time in robotic ventral hernia repair using machine learning: a retrospective pilot study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Application of machine learning and deep learning in the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop, validate, and evaluate machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting Surgical site infections (SSI) and surgical site occurrences (SSO) after elective open inguinal hernia surgery.
methodsA cohort of 491 patients who underwent elective open inguinal hernia surgery at Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital between December 2019 and December 2020 was enrolled. To create a strong prediction model, we employed five ML methods: generalized linear model, random forest (RF), support vector machines, neural network, and gradient boosting machine. Based on the best performing model, we devised online calculators to facilitate clinicians' access to a linear predictor for patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve was utilized to evaluate the model's discriminatory capability and predictive accuracy.
resultsThe incidence rates of SSI and SSO were 4.68% and 13.44%, respectively. Four variables (diabetes, recurrence, antibiotic prophylaxis, and duration of surgery) were identified for SSI prediction, while four variables (diabetes, size of hernias, albumin levels, and antibiotic prophylaxis) were included for SSO prediction. In the test set, the RF model showed the best predictive ability (SSI: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.849, sensitivity = 0.769, specificity = 0.769, and accuracy = 0.769; SSO: AUC = 0.740, sensitivity = 0.513, specificity = 0.821, and accuracy = 0.667). Online calculators have been developed to assess patients' risk of SSI ( https://wuqian17.shinyapps.io/predictionSSI/ ) and SSO ( https://wuqian17.shinyapps.io/predictionSSO/ ) after surgery.
conclusionsThis study developed a prediction model for SSI/SSO using ML methods. It holds the potential to facilitate the selection of appropriate treatment options following elective open inguinal hernia surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39287831What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.