ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2024
Endonasal Route for Tuberculum and Planum Meningiomas.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A refined radiological classification of anterior clinoid process pneumatization.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculum and planum meningiomas are challenging tumors per their critical location and neurovascular relationships. The standard treatment is usually represented by complete tumor removal, being the transcranial approaches the well-established routes. During the last decades, novel surgical routes have been experimented with emphasis on the concept of minimal invasive approaches. The peculiar perspective from below the endoscopic endonasal approach provides a short and direct access avoiding brain and neurovascular structures manipulation, featuring excellent outcomes and a reduced morbidity. Ideal indications are small or medium size midline meningiomas, with wide tuberculum sellae angle and deep sella at the sphenoid sinus, possibly with no optic nerve and/or vessels encasement. Adequate removal of paranasal structures and extended bony opening over the dural attachment provide a wide surgical corridor ensuring safe intradural exposure at the suprasellar area. The main advantage is related to early decompression of the optic apparatus and reduced manipulation of subchiasmatic perforating vessels, with improved visual outcomes. Direct exposure of the inferomedial aspect of the optic canals allows for maximal decompression in cases of tumor extending within. Transcranial approaches tend to be selected for larger tumors with lateral extension beyond optic nerves and supraclinoid carotid arteries, in inaccessible areas from an endonasal corridor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39287803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.