ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2024
Real-life effects of pharmacological osteoporosis treatments on bone mineral density by quantitative computed tomography.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fractal Dimension Analysis of Mandibular Trabecular Bone in Patients Receiving Antiresorptive Therapy for Osteoporosis and Oncologic Conditions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Real-Life Study in Sequential Therapy for Severe Menopausal Osteoporosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMonitoring of bone mineral density (BMD) is used to assess pharmacological osteoporosis therapy. This study examined the real-life effects of antiresorptive and osteoanabolic treatments on volumetric BMD (vBMD) of the spine by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients aged ≥ 50 years with a vBMD < 120 mg/ml had ≥ 2 QCT. For analysis of therapy effects, the pharmacological treatment and the duration of each therapy were considered. Identical vertebrae were evaluated in all vBMD measurements for each patient. A linear mixed model with random intercepts was used to estimate the effects of pharmacological treatments on vBMD.
resultsA total of 1145 vBMD measurements from 402 patients were analyzed. Considering potential confounders such as sex, age, and prior treatment, a reduction in trabecular vBMD was estimated for oral bisphosphonates (- 1.01 mg/ml per year; p < 0.001), intravenous bisphosphonates (- 0.93 mg/ml per year; p = 0.015) and drug holiday (- 1.58 mg/ml per year; p < 0.001). Teriparatide was estimated to increase trabecular vBMD by 4.27 mg/ml per year (p = 0.018). Patients receiving denosumab showed a statistically non-significant decrease in trabecular vBMD (- 0.44 mg/ml per year; p = 0.099). Compared to non-treated patients, pharmacological therapy had positive effects on trabecular vBMD (1.35 mg/ml; p = 0.001, 1.43 mg/ml; p = 0.004, 1.91 mg/ml; p < 0.001, and 6.63 mg/ml; p < 0.001 per year for oral bisphosphonates, intravenous bisphosphonates, denosumab, and teriparatide, respectively).
conclusionAn increase in trabecular vBMD by QCT was not detected with antiresorptive agents. Patients treated with teriparatide showed increasing trabecular vBMD. Non-treatment led to a larger decrease in trabecular vBMD than pharmacological therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39287797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.