ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2024
Population differences in putty-nosed monkey (Cercopithecus nictitans) call order.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A primate grammar enabling incremental processing.iScience · 2025Article
- Twenty-five years of primate research in the Ndoki forest, Republic of Congo.Primates; journal of primatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-human primates generally lack the ability to learn new call structures or to substantially modify existing ones, suggesting that callers need alternative mechanisms to convey information. One way to escape the constraints of limited vocal control is by assembling calls into variable sequences, as has been documented in various animal species. Here, we were interested in the flexibility with which different calls might be assembled in a species known for its meaningful call order, putty-nosed monkeys (Cercopithecus nictitans). Since most information comes from studies conducted at Gashaka Gumti National Park (Nigeria), we tested two further populations in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park (Republic of the Congo) and Taï National Park (Côte d'Ivoire) in how males responded to common threats, leopards, and crowned eagles. As predicted, callers produced the same basic call types as seen elsewhere-long 'pyow', short 'pyow' ('kek'), 'hack'-but populations differed in how males assembled calls. To leopards, males from both populations started with 'pyows' and 'keks', with occasional hacks later, as already reported from Gashaka. To crowned eagle, however, Nouabalé-Ndoki males consistently initiated their responses with 'pyows', whereas neither Taï nor Gashaka males ever did, demonstrating that nonhuman primates have some control over sequence production. We discuss possible mechanisms to account for the population differences, predation pressure, and male-male competition, and address implications for linguistic theories of animal call order, notably the Urgency and Informativity Principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39287698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.