Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287688›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2024

Alternative agar substitutes for culturing unculturable microorganisms.

K Demin, E Prazdnova, M Kulikov, M Mazanko, A Gorovtsov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K DeminSouthern Federal University, 344090, Rostov-On-Don, Russia. i@kincognita.ru.
E PrazdnovaSouthern Federal University, 344090, Rostov-On-Don, Russia.
M KulikovSouthern Federal University, 344090, Rostov-On-Don, Russia.
M MazankoSouthern Federal University, 344090, Rostov-On-Don, Russia.
A GorovtsovSouthern Federal University, 344090, Rostov-On-Don, Russia.

Funding

Strategic Academic Leadership Program of the Southern Federal University "Priority 2030" SP-12-23-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelling agents are necessary for the preparation of solid or semisolid media. For more than a hundred years, agar has been the primary gelling agent. However, a substantial body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that agar-based media inhibit the growth of many microbial species through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), toxic organic contaminants, or competitive exclusion effects. In this review we have compiled the largest amount of data to date on the use of various gelling agents in microbial isolation and cultivation, with the particular emphasis on rare microbe isolation cases. Our analysis suggested that microbial-derived compounds (especially gellan gum), as gelling agents, are superior to agar in their ability to isolate and maintain either new or known microbial species. We analyzed the reasons behind this success and concluded that there are phylum-level differences in microbial responses to the changes in conditions from natural to the laboratory conditions (with respect to gelling agent usage). Consequently, we hypothesize that at least partial success of microbial-derived gelling agents lies in the recreation of the natural microenvironment conditions (which we address as the "familiarity of conditions" hypothesis). Finally, we present a list of recommendations and suggestions for further microbial ecology studies.

Indexed as

AgarBacteriaCulture MediaPolysaccharides, BacterialGelsAgarCulture Mediagellan gumGelsPolysaccharides, BacterialAgarGellan gumGelling agentMicrobial ecologyUncultured microorganisms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.