ReviewArchives of microbiology2024
Alternative agar substitutes for culturing unculturable microorganisms.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Studying organosulfonate metabolism in southern Russia chernozem soil microbial community: ubiquity of the desulfonation pathways and possible mixotrophy in common soil heterotrophs.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Gellan gum-based media recover more diverse microbial communities from soil material.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- The Role of Nucleotide Sequencing in Natural Product Drug Discovery.Journal of natural products · 2025Review
- Hi-TARGET: a fast, efficient and versatile CRISPR type I-B genome editing tool for the thermophilic acetogen Thermoanaerobacter kivui.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gelling agents are necessary for the preparation of solid or semisolid media. For more than a hundred years, agar has been the primary gelling agent. However, a substantial body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that agar-based media inhibit the growth of many microbial species through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), toxic organic contaminants, or competitive exclusion effects. In this review we have compiled the largest amount of data to date on the use of various gelling agents in microbial isolation and cultivation, with the particular emphasis on rare microbe isolation cases. Our analysis suggested that microbial-derived compounds (especially gellan gum), as gelling agents, are superior to agar in their ability to isolate and maintain either new or known microbial species. We analyzed the reasons behind this success and concluded that there are phylum-level differences in microbial responses to the changes in conditions from natural to the laboratory conditions (with respect to gelling agent usage). Consequently, we hypothesize that at least partial success of microbial-derived gelling agents lies in the recreation of the natural microenvironment conditions (which we address as the "familiarity of conditions" hypothesis). Finally, we present a list of recommendations and suggestions for further microbial ecology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39287688What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.