ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Analysis of the optical performance of intraocular lenses using profilometric measurements.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tolerance of residual myopic refractive errors in eyes with enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses with higher-order aspheric optics.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Influences of myopic residual refractions on uncorrected distance visual acuity in eyes with conventional and enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Association of preoperative corneal spherical aberration with intermediate-to-near visual acuity in enhanced monofocal intraocular lens implantation: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Optical Performance of RayOne EMV and Tecnis Synergy Under Varying Pupil Sizes and Corneal Aberrations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Visual Outcomes of Toric and Nontoric Intraocular Lenses Featuring Combined Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Multifocal Designs.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Effect of Pupil Size and Corneal Aberration on the Optical Performance of Premium Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Design concepts for advanced-technology intraocular lenses [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Influence of Posterior Capsulotomy Size on Visual Quality and Patient Satisfaction with Extended Depth-of-Focus IOLs.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Maximizing extend visual outcomes with extend focus intraocular lens in eyes with axial length shorter than 24 mm.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Ray Visualization and Through-Focus Optical Quality of Diffractive Enhanced Monofocal and Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to develop a methodology, based on profilometer measurements to assess the optical behaviour of Intraocular Lenses (IOls). The "Modulation Transfer Function through-object" (MTF through-object) based on vergence object displacement was calculated for different pupil sizes and pseudophakic eyes. Tilt and decentration were also analysed in a realistic cornea eye model.
methodsFor comparison between the different IOLs, an optical quality criterion based on a minimum value the MTF through-object and the recognition of simulated vision optotypes was introduced. Five IOLs were used in this study: Tecnis Eyhance, Mini Well, Tecnis Symfony, Tecnis Synergy and RayOne EMV.
resultsThe technique was validated with previous methodologies. A general narrowing of the through-object MTF curve compared to the through-focus MTF curve was shown, resulting in greater distances between near and intermediate points and less depth of field around the far peak. The comparison between the IOLs showed that variations in corneal aberrations, pupil size and decentration caused relevant changes in IOL performance. A decrease of the SA produced a hypermetropic shift of the far focus between + 0.3 D and + 0.4 D. Most of IOLs worsen the optical quality as pupil size increased, even the MTF through-object shape changed. Decentration was an important factor in IOL implantation, causing a significant change in MTF through-object shape in most of IOLs.
conclusionsThis study highlights the need to evaluate pre-operative patients for corneal aberrations and pupillary size to have the best optical success after cataract surgery in multifocal or extended depth of focus IOLs. KEY MESSAGES: What is known MTF(Modulation Transfer Function) through-focus curves (calculated in image space by moving the detector plane) can be obtained from optical bench assembly or from commercial devices. Recently, some studies proposed to characterize the lens surface design based on the profilometric measurements What is new A novel methodology based on profilometer measurements to assess the optical behaviour of Intraocular Lenses (IOls) was shown. The "Modulation Transfer Function through-object" based on vergence object displacement was introduced in order to analyse five premium IOLs. MTF through-object curve is more appropriate for studying clinical behaviour, as it provides further near and intermediate points distances and lower depth of focus around far peak compare to MTF through-focus curves. The optical behaviour of the five IOLs can vary considerably depending on the eye model and pupil size. The effect of tilt and decentration on the MTF through-object the IOLs was analysed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.