Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287651›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2024

Pressure control plus spontaneous ventilation versus volume assist-control ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomised clinical trial.

Jean-Christophe M Richard, François M Beloncle, Gaëtan Béduneau, Satar Mortaza, Stephan Ehrmann, Jean-Luc Diehl, Gwenaël Prat, Samir Jaber, Hassene Rahmani, Jean Reignier and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06912906 (Comparison of Two Strategies to Allow Mechanical Ventilation Separation Using Biphasic Airway Pressure Ventilation Without Any Synchronization), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06912906 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Two Strategies to Allow Mechanical Ventilation Separation Using Biphasic Airway Pressure Ventilation Without Any Synchronization (BIPAP) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV): a Randomized Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsRan2025 to 2027Enrolled84ConditionsMechanical Ventilation WeaningArmsBIPAPasynchro: byphaisc positive pressure modality without any synchronisation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Right ventricular-protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: phenotypes, monitoring and ventilatory management.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  10. Update on acute respiratory failure.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jean-Christophe M RichardMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Vent'Lab, CHU d'Angers, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France. Jcmb.richard@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4721-6602
François M BeloncleMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Vent'Lab, CHU d'Angers, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Gaëtan BéduneauMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Univ Rouen Normandie, GRHVN UR 3830, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.
Satar MortazaMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Vent'Lab, CHU d'Angers, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Stephan EhrmannMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, INSERM CIC 1415, Crics-Triggersep F-CRIN Research Network, CHRU de Tours and Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, INSERM U1100, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Jean-Luc DiehlMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France.
Gwenaël PratMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
Samir JaberRéanimation Chirurgicale, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Hassene RahmaniMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, CHU de Strasbourg NHC, Strasbourg, France.
Jean ReignierMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Movement-Interactions-Performance, MIP UR 4334-CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Thierry BoulainMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, CHU d'Orléans, Orléans, France.
Hodane YonisMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, HC de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jack RichecoeurRéanimation Polyvalente, CH de Beauvais, Beauvais, France.
Arnaud W ThilleMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Pierre-Louis DeclercqMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, CH Dieppe, Dieppe, France.
Emmanuel AntokRéanimation Polyvalente, CHU Sud Réunion, La Réunion, France.
Guillaume CarteauxMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France.
Bruno VielleDépartement de Biostatistiques, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
Laurent BrochardKeenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Alain MercatMédecine Intensive, Réanimation, Vent'Lab, CHU d'Angers, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
REVA network

Funding

Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche 49RC-09-04-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the effect of a pressure-controlled strategy allowing non-synchronised unassisted spontaneous ventilation (PC-SV) to a conventional volume assist-control strategy (ACV) on the outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

methodsOpen-label randomised clinical trial in 22 intensive care units (ICU) in France. Seven hundred adults with moderate or severe ARDS (PaO

resultsHospital mortality [34.6% vs 33.5%, p = 0.77, risk ratio (RR) = 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.27)], 28-day mortality, as well as the number of ventilator-free days and organ failure-free days at day 28 did not differ between PC-SV and ACV groups. Patients in the PC-SV group received significantly less sedation and neuro-muscular blocking agents than in the ACV group. A lower proportion of patients required adjunctive therapy of hypoxemia (including prone positioning) in the PC-SV group than in the ACV group [33.1% vs 41.3%, p = 0.03, RR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.98)]. The incidences of pneumothorax and refractory hypoxemia did not differ between the groups.

conclusionsA strategy based on PC-SV mode that favours spontaneous ventilation reduced the need for sedation and adjunctive therapies of hypoxemia but did not significantly reduce mortality compared to ACV with similar tidal volume and PEEP levels.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeTidal VolumeAdultAgedFemaleFranceHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsInteractive Ventilatory SupportMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialAcute respiratory distress syndromeMechanical ventilationNeuro-muscular blocking agentsPressure-controlled ventilationSedationSpontaneous ventilation

Identifiers

PMID39287651
PMCPMC11457688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.