Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287649›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2024

Central venous catheter-related infection: does insertion site still matter? A French multicentric cohort study.

Vincent Cosme, Nicolas Massart, Florian Reizine, Anaïs Machut, Charles-Hervé Vacheron, Anne Savey, Arnaud Friggeri, Alain Lepape, REAREZO study group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vincent Cosme *Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Saint Brieuc, Saint-Brieuc, France.
Nicolas Massart *Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Saint Brieuc, Saint-Brieuc, France. nicolas.massart@armorsante.bzh.ORCID 0000-0001-5828-0197
Florian ReizineService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Vannes, Vannes, France.
Anaïs MachutREA-REZO Infections et Antibiorésistance en Réanimation, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
Charles-Hervé VacheronREA-REZO Infections et Antibiorésistance en Réanimation, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
Anne SaveyREA-REZO Infections et Antibiorésistance en Réanimation, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
Arnaud FriggeriREA-REZO Infections et Antibiorésistance en Réanimation, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
Alain LepapeREA-REZO Infections et Antibiorésistance en Réanimation, Hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
REAREZO study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aim to evaluate the association between central venous catheter (CVC) insertion site and microbiological CVC complications in a nationwide cohort.

methodsThis study was conducted using the healthcare-associated infection surveillance cohort "REA-REZO" involving 193 intensive care units (ICUs). All CVC inserted and removed during the same ICU stay between January 1st 2018 and December 31st 2022 were eligible but only those whose tips were sent for microbiological analysis were included. Primary objective was to describe CVC insertion sites and subsequent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI).

resultsOut of 126,997 CVCs, 71,314 were not sent for tip culture, and only 55,663 CVCs were included, (30,548 in internal jugular [IJ], 14,423 in femoral and 10,692 in subclavian [SC] sites). The incidence of CRBSI was 0.7 [0.6-0.8] in the IJ site, 0.7 [0.6-0.9] in the femoral site, and 0.6 [0.4-0.7] CRBSI per 1000 CVC days in the SC site (p = 0.248). The multivariable Poisson regression model showed no differences of CRBSI incidence rates between the three insertion sites. Microorganisms observed in CRBSI were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (27.9%), Enterobacterales (27.5%), non-fermenting Gram-negative Bacilli (10.4%), Candida sp. (16.9%), and Staphylococcus aureus (16.9%).

conclusionLow CRBSI incidence rates were reported. CRBSI incidences rates were similar in the three insertion sites. Uncertainty remains due to potential selection bias since many CVCs had to be excluded.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFemoral VeinFranceHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsJugular VeinsMaleMiddle AgedSubclavian VeinAcquired infectionBacteremiaCatheter-related infectionCentral venous catheterColonization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.