ArticleIntensive care medicine2024
Central venous catheter-related infection: does insertion site still matter? A French multicentric cohort study.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Central venous catheter-related infections: a systematic review, meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression comparing ultrasound guidance and landmark technique for insertion.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Ultrasound-Guided In-Plane Subclavian Vein Puncture versus Prior Ultrasound and Landmark Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2026Trial
- Site-specific complications of central venous catheterization under systematic ultrasound guidance: a target trial emulation revisiting the 3SITES study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Article
- Prevalence and Multidrug Resistance of WHO-Priority Bacterial Pathogens in a Romanian Intensive Care Unit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison and validation of multiple machine learning algorithms for predicting MDRO infection in catheter-related bloodstream patients: a multicenter cohort study.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- The risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection between internal jugular and subclavian sites in critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Risk factors for catheter-related infections in neck tumor patients undergoing chemotherapy through peripherally inserted central catheters.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Development of a risk prediction model for catheter-related bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients based on identified risk factors.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Anticoagulation management and outcomes in critically ill patients with acute mesenteric ischemia: an international study.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Reassessing the Risk: A Retrospective Analysis of CLABSI Risk in Femoral, Internal Jugular, and Subclavian Central Venous Catheters.Critical care research and practice · 2025Article
- Challenges in optimizing the treatment of Pneumocystis pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Author's reply.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aim to evaluate the association between central venous catheter (CVC) insertion site and microbiological CVC complications in a nationwide cohort.
methodsThis study was conducted using the healthcare-associated infection surveillance cohort "REA-REZO" involving 193 intensive care units (ICUs). All CVC inserted and removed during the same ICU stay between January 1st 2018 and December 31st 2022 were eligible but only those whose tips were sent for microbiological analysis were included. Primary objective was to describe CVC insertion sites and subsequent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI).
resultsOut of 126,997 CVCs, 71,314 were not sent for tip culture, and only 55,663 CVCs were included, (30,548 in internal jugular [IJ], 14,423 in femoral and 10,692 in subclavian [SC] sites). The incidence of CRBSI was 0.7 [0.6-0.8] in the IJ site, 0.7 [0.6-0.9] in the femoral site, and 0.6 [0.4-0.7] CRBSI per 1000 CVC days in the SC site (p = 0.248). The multivariable Poisson regression model showed no differences of CRBSI incidence rates between the three insertion sites. Microorganisms observed in CRBSI were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (27.9%), Enterobacterales (27.5%), non-fermenting Gram-negative Bacilli (10.4%), Candida sp. (16.9%), and Staphylococcus aureus (16.9%).
conclusionLow CRBSI incidence rates were reported. CRBSI incidences rates were similar in the three insertion sites. Uncertainty remains due to potential selection bias since many CVCs had to be excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39287649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.