Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287620›Full record

ArticleAndrology2025

Deep learning classification method for boar sperm morphology analysis.

Alexandra Keller, McKenna Maus, Emma Keller, Karl Kerns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antioxidant Activity ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra KellerDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-8422
McKenna MausDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Emma KellerDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Karl KernsDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7425-0131

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive 2022-67015-36298US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoar semen quality emphasizes three major criteria: sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. Methods to analyze concentration and motility quickly and objectively readily exist, but few exist for analyzing morphology outside of subjective manual counting. Other vital factors for fertilization, like acrosome health, lack efficient detection methods due to limitations in detection by the human eye and costly biomarker analysis, which is rarely used in semen diagnostics.

objectiveTo overcome these challenges, we propose a novel approach integrating deep-learning technology with high-throughput image-based flow cytometry (IBFC) for objective and accurate analysis of both morphology and label-free acrosome health of thousands of individual spermatozoa at once, as opposed to manually counting on a microscope slide. MATERIALS AND

methodsImages of 10,000 spermatozoa were captured using an IBFC and manually annotated based on the primary morphological defect or acrosome health status for the training of the convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN used these images to train and then applied that training to unannotated images to predict the model accuracy.

resultsUsing the CNNs, high F1 scores of 96.73%, 98.55%, and 99.31% for 20x, 40x, and 60x magnifications, respectively, for morphological classification were attained. Additionally, the model demonstrates an F1 score of 99.8% in detecting subtle acrosome health variations at the 60x magnification. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsWe have established an integrated approach to rapidly collect and classify morphological defects and acrosome health status, without the use of manual counting or biomarker labeling. Our study underscores the potential of artificial intelligence in semen diagnostics, reducing technician variability, streamlining assays, and facilitating the development of additional label-free detection methods. This innovative approach addresses the barriers hindering biomarker adoption in semen analysis, offering a promising avenue for enhancing reproductive health assessments.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaAcrosomeAnimalsFlow CytometryMaleSperm MotilitySwineacrosomeboardeep learninglabel‐freemale fertilitysperm morphology

Identifiers

PMID39287620
PMCPMC12368927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.