ArticleAndrology2025
Deep learning classification method for boar sperm morphology analysis.
Article in Andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Lightweight Deep Learning Model for Boar Sperm Head Detection in Microscopic Images: YOLO11_SRP.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Deep learning-enabled morphology analysis of bovine sperm for label-free imaging flow cytometry.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Design and Implementation of a Deep Learning System to Analyze Bovine Sperm Morphology.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Antioxidant Activity ofVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Deep feature engineering for accurate sperm morphology classification using CBAM-enhanced ResNet50.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoar semen quality emphasizes three major criteria: sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. Methods to analyze concentration and motility quickly and objectively readily exist, but few exist for analyzing morphology outside of subjective manual counting. Other vital factors for fertilization, like acrosome health, lack efficient detection methods due to limitations in detection by the human eye and costly biomarker analysis, which is rarely used in semen diagnostics.
objectiveTo overcome these challenges, we propose a novel approach integrating deep-learning technology with high-throughput image-based flow cytometry (IBFC) for objective and accurate analysis of both morphology and label-free acrosome health of thousands of individual spermatozoa at once, as opposed to manually counting on a microscope slide. MATERIALS AND
methodsImages of 10,000 spermatozoa were captured using an IBFC and manually annotated based on the primary morphological defect or acrosome health status for the training of the convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN used these images to train and then applied that training to unannotated images to predict the model accuracy.
resultsUsing the CNNs, high F1 scores of 96.73%, 98.55%, and 99.31% for 20x, 40x, and 60x magnifications, respectively, for morphological classification were attained. Additionally, the model demonstrates an F1 score of 99.8% in detecting subtle acrosome health variations at the 60x magnification. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsWe have established an integrated approach to rapidly collect and classify morphological defects and acrosome health status, without the use of manual counting or biomarker labeling. Our study underscores the potential of artificial intelligence in semen diagnostics, reducing technician variability, streamlining assays, and facilitating the development of additional label-free detection methods. This innovative approach addresses the barriers hindering biomarker adoption in semen analysis, offering a promising avenue for enhancing reproductive health assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.