ArticleEpilepsia2024
Statistical characteristics of large-scale objective tonic-clonic seizure records from medical smartwatches used in daily life.
Article in Epilepsia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tonic-clonic seizures captured during ambulatory video-EEG are frequently unreported.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Article
- Patterns of seizure frequency reduction in clinical trial participants with lower baseline seizure frequency.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- L-Relationship between uncertainty and average seizure frequency in clinical trials of antiseizure medications.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Article
- The Road Not Taken: Misclassifying an Anti-Seizure Medication as a Failure.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Circadian attributes of neurological and psychiatric disorders as basis for their medication chronotherapy.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether population-level patterns in seizure occurrence previously observed in self-reported diaries, medical records, and electroencephalographic recordings were also present in tonic-clonic seizure (TCS) diaries produced via the combined input of a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared wristband with an artificial intelligence detection algorithm and patient self-reports. We also investigated the characteristics of patient interactions with wearable seizure alerts.
methodsWe analyzed wristband data from patients with TCSs who had at least three reported TCSs over a minimum of 90 days. We quantified TCS frequency and cycles, and the relationship between the mean and variability of monthly TCS counts. We also assessed interaction metrics such as false alarm dismissal and seizure confirmation rates.
resultsApplying strict criteria for usable data, we reviewed 137 490 TCSs from 3012 patients, with a median length of TCS alert records of 445 days (range = 90-1806). Analyses showed consistency between prior diary studies and the present data concerning (1) the distribution of monthly TCS frequency (median = 3.1, range = .08-26); (2) the linear relationship (slope = .79, R SIGNIFICANCE: Key population-level patterns in seizure occurrence are recapitulated in wrist-worn device recordings, supporting their validity for tracking TCS burden. Compared to other approaches, wearables can provide noninvasive, objective, long-term data, revealing cycles in seizure risk. However, improved patient engagement with wristband alerts and further validation of detection accuracy in ambulatory settings are needed. Together, these findings suggest that data from smart wristbands may be used to derive features of TCS records and, ultimately, facilitate remote monitoring and the development of personalized forecasting tools for TCS management. Our findings may not generalize to other types of seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.