Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287586›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Establishing Clinical Trial Endpoints in Selecting Patients for RPGR Retinal Gene Therapy.

Evita Evangelia Christou, Amandeep S Josan, Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic, Robert E MacLaren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evita Evangelia ChristouNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Amandeep S JosanNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jasmina Cehajic-KapetanovicNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical trials for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (RP) often assess retinal structure using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and function using microperimetry to evaluate initial eligibility and endpoints. Therefore, we seek to determine which parameters might be most sensitive in screening new patients for enrollment. Methods: Thirty-one patients (62 eyes) with confirmed retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) mutations attending Oxford Eye Hospital were included in this retrospective analysis. Outer retinal structure was investigated by measuring the remaining ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM) on OCT. Visual function was evaluated by using 10-2 microperimetry mean sensitivity. Results: The median age of patients with RPGR was 31 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-39 years). For the right and left eyes, respectively, the median EZ length through the foveal section was 921 µm (IQR = 607-1570) and 865 µm (IQR = 508-1442) and median ELM length was 2056 µm (IQR = 1336-2764) and 1860 µm (IQR = 1152-2680). Similarly, the median microperimetry sensitivity (MS) was 2.0 decibel (dB; IQR = 0.4-5.4) and 1.1 dB (IQR = 0.1-5.4). Linear mixed model regression analysis showed that EZ was significantly positively correlated to ELM (P < 0.001, R² = 0.931). EZ and ELM were significantly correlated with the microperimetry sensitivity with exponential relationship (P < 0.001, R² = 0.71 and 0.72, respectively). Using the exponential equation of regression line, EZ below approximately 600 µm (RE = 637 µm, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 397-877, LE = 586 µm, 95% CI = 356-817) results in microperimetry sensitivity of approximately 0 dB. There was high degree of inter-eye symmetry for progression of EZ, ELM, and microperimetry sensitivity. Age was significantly correlated with the analyzed parameters (P < 0.001), although with low R² for each of them. Discussion: EZ may comprise a surrogate biomarker for prediction of visual function in X-linked RP caused by mutations in RPGR and, in turn, identification of appropriate patients for enrollment in clinical trials. As expected, age plays a role in predicting potential biomarkers and visual function, however, it should not be used to preclude patients for gene therapy due to the poor correlation and heterogeneity of disease onset. Translational Relevance: Biomarkers of visual function in RPGR-associated RP may lead to identification of appropriate patients for enrollment in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Eye ProteinsGenetic TherapyRetinitis PigmentosaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityAdultClinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMutationPatient SelectionRetinaRetrospective StudiesVisual FieldsEye ProteinsRPGR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID39287586
PMCPMC11412382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.