ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2024
A novel DNA damage detection method based on a distinct DNA damage response system.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Can 'Health in All Policies' Help Maximise the Potential of Microbial Biotechnologies for Health, Equity and Sustainability?Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
- Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- A novel DNA damage detection method based on a distinct DNA damage response system.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA damage occurs when cells encounter exogenous and endogenous stresses such as long periods of desiccation, ionizing radiation and genotoxic chemicals. Efforts have been made to detect DNA damage in vivo and in vitro to characterize or quantify the damage level. It is well accepted that single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is one of the important byproducts of DNA damage to trigger the downstream regulation. A recent study has revealed that PprI efficiently recognizes ssDNA and cleaves DdrO at a specific site on the cleavage site region (CSR) loop in the presence of ssDNA, which enables the radiation resistance of Deinococcus. Leveraging this property, we developed a quantitative DNA damage detection method in vitro based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). DdrO protein was fused with eYFP and eCFP on the N-terminal and C-terminal respectively, between which the FRET efficiency serves as an indicator of cleavage efficiency as well as the concentration of ssDNA. The standard curve between the concentration of ssDNA and the FRET efficiency was constructed, and application examples were tested, validating the effectiveness of this method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.