ArticleRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2024
FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH DELAYED DIAGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY VITREORETINAL LYMPHOMA.
Article in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ocular Imaging in Intraocular Lymphoma: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify demographic and clinical factors associated with delayed diagnosis in patients with primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL).
methodsRetrospective, tertiary referral center-based cohort study of all patients at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of VRL from January 1, 2000, to October 31, 2022.
resultsThere were 87 patients included during the 22-year study period with 73 patients (83.9%) diagnosed with VRL upon initial evaluation at the tertiary center, with the other 14 patients (16.1%) diagnosed later. The median referral time was 4.8 months (range: 0-113 months). Patients who received an initial diagnosis of inflammatory uveitis or another incorrect diagnosis elsewhere were referred slower than those initially diagnosed with VRL (P = 0.04). The most common incorrect initial diagnosis from an outside institution was inflammatory uveitis (n = 35, 40.2%). When patients were split into four groups based on referral time, prior use of corticosteroids was associated with a significant delay in referral (P = 0.03).
conclusionDiagnosing VRL continues to be challenging, as months-long delays from initial evaluation to expert referral center evaluation are common. Prior use of corticosteroids was associated with delay in diagnosis and referral time, underscoring the need to increase awareness regarding differences between VRL and uveitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.