Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287517›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Benchmarking deep learning-based low-dose CT image denoising algorithms.

Elias Eulig, Björn Ommer, Marc Kachelrieß

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ErisNet: A Deep Learning Model for Noise Reduction in CT Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elias EuligDivision of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Björn OmmerCompVis @ LMU Munich, MCML, Munich, Germany.
Marc KachelrießDivision of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Helmholtz International Graduate School for Cancer Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-lasting efforts have been made to reduce radiation dose and thus the potential radiation risk to the patient for computed tomography (CT) acquisitions without severe deterioration of image quality. To this end, various techniques have been employed over the years including iterative reconstruction methods and noise reduction algorithms. PURPOSE: Recently, deep learning-based methods for noise reduction became increasingly popular and a multitude of papers claim ever improving performance both quantitatively and qualitatively. However, the lack of a standardized benchmark setup and inconsistencies in experimental design across studies hinder the verifiability and reproducibility of reported results.

methodsIn this study, we propose a benchmark setup to overcome those flaws and improve reproducibility and verifiability of experimental results in the field. We perform a comprehensive and fair evaluation of several state-of-the-art methods using this standardized setup.

resultsOur evaluation reveals that most deep learning-based methods show statistically similar performance, and improvements over the past years have been marginal at best.

conclusionsThis study highlights the need for a more rigorous and fair evaluation of novel deep learning-based methods for low-dose CT image denoising. Our benchmark setup is a first and important step towards this direction and can be used by future researchers to evaluate their algorithms.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansbenchmarkingcomputed tomographydeep learningdenoisinglow‐dose

Identifiers

PMID39287517
PMCPMC11656299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.