ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2024
Application and antagonistic mechanisms of atoxigenic
Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprospecting Fungal Biocontrol Agents from Florida Agroecosystems Against Celery Early Blight Caused byPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Distinct Phenotype and Secondary Metabolite Profile Mark a DominantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plant-microbiome interactions suppress Fusarium wilt by enriching beneficial Aspergillus in the tobacco rhizosphere.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- EndophyticMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review covers, for the first time, all methods based on the use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.