Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287374›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

Impact of urbanization on gut microbiome mosaics across geographic and dietary contexts.

Elizaveta Vinogradova, Nurislam Mukhanbetzhanov, Madiyar Nurgaziyev, Zharkyn Jarmukhanov, Rakhilya Aipova, Aliya Sailybayeva, Makhabbat Bekbossynova, Samat Kozhakhmetov, Almagul Kushugulova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Gut Microbiota as a Mediator of Dietary Salt Effects on Blood Pressure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizaveta VinogradovaCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0003-1845-2726
Nurislam MukhanbetzhanovCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-7871
Madiyar NurgaziyevCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2397-4978
Zharkyn JarmukhanovCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-1869-1087
Rakhilya AipovaKazakh Research Institute of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry named after U.Uspanov, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8318-6776
Aliya SailybayevaJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-1489-3837
Makhabbat BekbossynovaJSC "National Research Cardiac Surgery Center", Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-2834-617X
Samat KozhakhmetovCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9668-0327
Almagul KushugulovaCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-0899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of how urban-rural divides influence gut microbial diversity and composition across the distinct geographical landscapes of Kazakhstan, elucidating the intricate interplay between lifestyle, environment, and gut microbiome. In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled 651 participants from urban centers and rural settlements across Kazakhstan, following ethical approval and informed consent. Comprehensive demographic, dietary, and stool sample data were collected. 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics techniques were employed to delineate the intricate patterns of the gut microbiome. A rigorous statistical framework dissected the interplay between urbanization gradients, geography, dietary lifestyles, and microbial dynamics. Our findings demonstrate a stark microbial divide between urban and rural gut ecosystems. The study found significant differences in gut microbiome diversity and composition between urban and rural populations in Kazakhstan. Urban microbiomes exhibited reduced diversity, higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios, and increased prevalence of genera IMPORTANCE: The study examined gut microbiome composition across diverse geographical locations in Kazakhstan, spanning urban centers and rural settlements. This allows for thoroughly investigating how urbanization gradients and geographic factors shape the gut microbiome. The study's examination of the gut resistome and prevalence of virulence-associated genes provide essential insights into the public health implications of urbanization-driven microbiome alterations. Collecting comprehensive demographic, dietary, and stool sample data enables the researchers to better understand the relationships between urbanization, nutritional patterns, and gut microbiome composition. The findings have important implications for understanding how urbanization-driven microbiome changes may impact human health and well-being, paving the way for tailored interventions to restore a balanced gut microbial ecology.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeUrbanizationAdultBacteriaFecesFemaleHumansKazakhstanMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRural PopulationUrban PopulationYoung AdultRNA, Ribosomal, 16Santibiotic resistancedietary patternsgeographic patternsgut microbiomemicrobial diversityurbanizationvirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID39287374
PMCPMC11494887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.