Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287192›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2024

Cesarean Sections Under Spinal Anaesthesia: Comparison of Varying Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with 0.75% Hyperbaric Ropivacaine: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.

Srinivasa Rao Nallam, Srikavya Kandala, Sreelekha Kanipakam, Vinay Bathini, Sunil Chiruvella, Sonu Sesham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Srinivasa Rao NallamDr YSR Government Medical College, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Pulivendula, India.ORCID 0009-0008-2624-8051
Srikavya KandalaGovernment Medical College, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Kadapa, India.ORCID 0009-0005-5119-0072
Sreelekha KanipakamGovernment Medical College, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Kadapa, India.ORCID 0009-0008-4272-2075
Vinay BathiniGovernment Medical College, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Kadapa, India.ORCID 0009-0006-2129-2825
Sunil ChiruvellaGovernment Medical College, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Kadapa, India.ORCID 0009-0004-1441-7488
Sonu SeshamGovernment Medical College, Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Kadapa, India.ORCID 0009-0007-7099-3641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5 μg, 7.5 μg, and 10 μg doses of dexmedetomidine added to hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine on the duration of analgesia during cesarean section. Furthermore, the onset of sensory and motor block, hemodynamics, sedation, and adverse effects were investigated. Methods: A total of 120 full-term parturients scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into three groups. Group RD5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 5 μg (0.5 mL), group RD7.5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 7.5 μg (0.5 mL), and group RD10 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 10 μg (0.5 mL). Sensorimotor blockade characteristics, analgesia duration, hemodynamic variables, and adverse events were documented. Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used for data analysis. Results: In groups RD5, RD7.5, and RD10, the onset of sensory block was 2.96±1.32 min, 2.26±1.50 min, and 1.96±0.93 min, respectively, while the onset of motor block was 9.63±0.11 min, 8.63±0.58 min, and 6.40±0.14 min, respectively. The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group RD10 compared with groups RD7.5 and RD5 (483.43±76.21 vs. 398.74±73.59 vs. 362.58±79.87 min, respectively, Conclusion: We conclude that increasing dexmedetomidine doses decreases the onset of sensory and motor blockade while prolonging analgesia duration in a dose-dependent manner.

Indexed as

Analgesiacesarean sectiondexmedetomidineropivacainespinal anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39287192
PMCPMC11590690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.