Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39287096›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2025

Utility of interleukin-6 to identify serious bacterial infections in febrile infants aged ≤60 days.

Ioannis Orfanos, Emilie Thorén Krusell, Kristina Elfving

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioannis OrfanosDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0466-4499
Emilie Thorén KrusellDepartment of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kristina ElfvingDepartment of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4477-8765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study is to investigate the utility of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the early diagnosis of serious bacterial infections (SBI) in febrile infants and to compare it with C-reactive protein (CRP).

methodsRetrospective study conducted in the paediatric emergency department in Gothenburg, Sweden, on previously healthy, full-term infants aged ≤60 days with fever without a source (FWS) from 2014 to 2017.

resultsWe included 536 infants with FWS, of whom IL-6 was analysed in 364 (68%) and CRP was analysed in 494 (92%). Approximately 70% of the infants presented with a fever duration of less than 12 h. The prevalence of SBIs was 14.8% (95% CI,11.3-18.9) in the IL-6 group and 17.8% (95% CI,14.5-21.5) in the CRP group. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of IL-6 ≥50 ng/L were 93%, 66%, 98% and 33%, respectively. For CRP ≥20 mg/L, the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were 76%, 89%, 95%, and 55%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that CRP was significantly associated with SBI (p < 0.0001) in the entire population, whereas IL-6 was not.

conclusionInterleukin-6 showed high sensitivity and NPV, which might assist in identifying SBIs early in febrile infants. However, IL-6 was not shown to be superior to CRP and further studies are needed to investigate whether IL-6 should be incorporated in clinical management.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsC-Reactive ProteinInterleukin-6BiomarkersFemaleFeverHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6biomarkersC‐reactive proteinfebrile infantinterleukin‐6neonateserious bacterial infection

Identifiers

PMID39287096
PMCPMC11627453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.